Cases 131 - 140 of 1,381
In re Goldman Sachs Group, Inc
as 22-484
Plaintiff:
Pension Funds, Ilene Richman, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Pablo Elizondo and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Arkansas Teachers Retirement System, West Virginia Investment Management Board and Plumbers and Pipefitters Pension Group
Defendant:
Sarah E. Smith
Defendant / Appellant:
Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., Lloyd C. Blankfein, David A. Viniar and others
United States of America v. Burgess (Sumpter)
as 22-473
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Tyshawn Burgess, AKA Ty, AKA Ty Black, Lloyd Gordon, AKA LG, Larry Bayer, AKA L and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Tyrell Sumpter, AKA Rell, AKA Ruger
New York State Thruway Employe v. New York State Thruway Authori
as 22-429
Petitioner:
New York State Thruway Employees Local 72, Joseph E. Colombo, George Savoie and others
Respondent:
New York State Thruway Authority, Howard P. Milstein, individually and in his official capacity as Chairman of the New York State Thruway Authority, Thomas J. Madison, Jr., individually and in his official capacity as Executive Director of the New York State Thruway Authority and others
Donohue v. Madison
as 22-435
Petitioner:
Danny Donohue, as President of the Civil Service Employees Association, Inc., Local 1000, AFSCME, AFL-CIO, Civil Service Employees Association, Inc., Local 1000, AFSCME, AFL-CIO, William Coleman, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Respondent:
Thomas J. Madison, Jr., in his official capacity as Executive Director of the New York State Thruway Authority and the New York State Canal Corporation, Carlos Millian, in his official capacity as Director of Employee Relations and Employee Safety, New York State Thruway Authority and New York State Canal Corporation;, Brian U. Stratton, in his official capacity as Director of the New York State Canal Corporation and others
Donohue v. Madison
as 22-437
Petitioner:
Danny Donohue, as President of the Civil Service Employees Association, Inc., Local 1000, Civil Service Employees Association, Inc., Local 1000, AFSCME, AFL - CIO, John Dellio, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Respondent:
Thomas J. Madison, Jr., Individually and in his official capacity as Executive Director of the New York State Thruway Authority and the New York State Canal Corporation, Carlos Millan, in his official capacity as Director of Employee Relations and Employee Safety, New York State Thruway Authority and New York State Canal Corporation, Howard P. Milstein, Individually and in his official capacity as Chairman of New York State Thruway/Canal Corporation Board of Directors and others
Ogbolu v. The Trustees of Columbia Unive
as 22-419
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Brandon E. Ogbolu
Defendant / Appellee:
The Trustees of Columbia University in the City of New York, Lee C. Bollinger, Jane E. Booth and others
Saba Capital CEF Opportunities v. Nuveen Floating Rate Income Fu
as 22-407
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Saba Capital CEF Opportunities 1, Ltd. and Saba Capital Management, L.P.
Defendant / Appellant:
Nuveen Floating Rate Income Fund, Nuveen Floating Rate Income Opportunity Fund, Nuveen Short Duration Credit Opportunities Fund and others
Maso Capital Investments v. E-House (China) Holdings
as 22-355
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Maso Capital Investments Limited, Altimeo Asset Management, Blackwell Partners LLC Series A and others
Defendant / Appellee:
E-House (China) Holdings Limited, Xin Zhou, Neil Nanpeng Shen and others
Zanghi v. Ritella
as 22-266
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Francesco Zanghi, Zhanghi LLC. and Zanghi LLC.
Defendant / Appellee:
Piergraziano Ritella, Futura Hospitality LLC, Giuseppe Cavallaro and others
Guardado-Turcios v. Garland
as 22-6058
Petitioner:
A. E. L-G. and MARIA SEBASTIAN GUARDADO-TURCIOS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
