Other Statutes Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Cases 21 - 30 of 36
Rosemond v. Decker
as 20-1825
Respondent: Director Thomas Decker, in his official capacity as Field Office Director, New York City Field Office, U.S. Immigration & Customs Enforcement, Attorney General William P. Barr, n his official capacity as Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice, Acting Secretary Kevin McAleenan, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and others
Petitioner: Jean Rosemond
Mathurin v. Barr
as 20-1810
Respondent: Chad F. Wolf, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Jeffrey Searls, in his official capacity as Acting Assistant Field Office Director and Administrator, Buffalo Federal Detention Facility, Thomas E. Feeley, in his official capacity as Field Office Director, Buffalo Field Office, U.S. Immigration & Customs Enforcement and others
Petitioner: Ravely Junior Mathurin
Garcia v. Decker
as 20-1649
Respondent: Chad F. Wolf, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Thomas Decker, in his official capacity as Field Office Director, New York City Field Office, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and William P. Barr, in his official capacity as Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice
Petitioner: Oscar Leonel Garcia
Guerrero v. Decker
as 20-1615
Petitioner: Domingo Guerrero
Respondent: Thomas Decker, in his official capacity as Field Office Director, New York City Field Office, U.S. Immigration & Customs Enforcement, Chad F. Wolf, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and William P. Barr, in his official capacity as Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice
In re: Demetrio Lifrieri
as 20-1498
Respondent: Henry S. Dogin, Administrator Law Enforcement Assistance Administration, U.S. Department of Justice, Thomas A. Coughlin, III, David R. Harris, Superintendent and others
Petitioner: Demetrio Lifrieri
Sophia v. Decker
as 20-1255
Respondent: James McHenry, as Director of the Executive Office for Immigration Review, William P. Barr, as Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice, Chad F. Wolf, as Acting Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and others
Petitioner: Naishel Sophia
Cabanillas Lazo v. Decker
as 20-1140
Respondent: Chad F. Wolf, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, William P. Barr, in his official capacity as Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice and Thomas Decker, in his official capacity as Field Office Director, New York City Field Office, U.S. Immigration & Customs Enforcement
Petitioner: Jim Marco Cabanillas Lazo
Medley v. Decker
as 20-631
Defendant / Appellant: Chad F. Wolf, as Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, in his official capacity, Thomas Decker, as Field Office Director, New York City Field Office, U.S. Immigration & Customs Enforcement, in his official capacity and William P. Barr, as Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice, in his official capacity
Plaintiff / Appellee: Leon Leonard Medley
Rivera-Velasquez v. Decker
as 20-615
Respondent: Chad F. Wolf, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, James McHenry, Thomas Decker, as Field Office Director, New York City Field Office, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Petitioner: Elmer Rivera-Velasquez
Gomez Dubon v. Decker
as 19-4341
Petitioner: Omar Esau Gomez Dubon
Respondent: William P. Barr, in his official capacity as Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice, Thomas Decker, in his official capacity as Field Office Director, New York City Field Office, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Kevin K. McAleenan, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?