Cases 31 - 40 of 60
Djenasevic v. The People of The State of New
as 19-538
Respondent / Appellee:
The People of The State of New York
Petitioner / Appellant:
Kabil A. Djenasevic
Peterson v. The People of the State of New
as 19-349
Respondent:
The People of The State of New York
Petitioner:
Carlos Peterson
Onatolu v. The People of The State of New
as 19-246
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Adekunle A. Onatolu
Defendant / Appellee:
The People of The State of New York
Goodson v. Zion
as 19-178
Defendant / Appellee:
Marian Zion, Attorney and John Doe, Officer of 32nd Precinct
Plaintiff / Appellant:
James Earl Goodson
Defendant:
Attorney Mariah Zion, The People of The State of New York and ABA John Doe
Nowakowski v. People of the State of New Yo
as 19-57
Petitioner / Appellant:
Robert Nowakowski
Respondent / Appellee:
People of the State of New York
Davis v. The People of New York State
as 18-627
Petitioner:
Raul Davis
Respondent:
The People of The State of New York
Federal Trade Commission v. Quincy Bioscience Holding Comp
as 17-3791
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission
Plaintiff - Appellant:
People of the State of New York, by Barbara D. Underwood, Attorney General of the State of New York
Defendant - Appellee:
Quincy Bioscience Holding Company, Inc., a corporation, Quincy Bioscience, LLC, a limited liability company, Prevagen, Inc., a corporation, DBA Sugar River Supplements and others
Plotzker v. Kips Bay Endoscopy, LLC
as 17-3229
Plaintiff:
Edward Plotzker, On behalf of the people of the State of New York and the United States of America and ABC
Defendant:
Kips Bay Endoscopy Center, LLC, Kips Bay Anesthesia, P.C., Kips Bay Endoscopy, LLC and others
Cruz v. People of the State of New Yo
as 17-2338
Petitioner - Appellant:
Edwin Cruz
Respondent - Appellee:
People of the State of New York
Peterson v. The People of the State of New
as 17-1483
Petitioner:
Carlos Peterson
Respondent:
The People of The State of New York
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
