Other Statutes Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Cases 41 - 50 of 51
Blessing v. Sirius XM Radio Inc.
as 11-3965
Plaintiff - Appellee: Carl Blessing, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Edward A. Scerbo, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, John Cronin, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant - Appellee: Sirius XM Radio Inc.
Objector: Linda Mrosko, Crutchfield Stephen, Krueger D. Scott and others
Objector - Appellant: John Ireland
Blessing v. Sirius XM Radio Inc.
as 11-3970
Plaintiff - Appellee: Carl Blessing, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Edward A. Scerbo, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, John Cronin, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant - Appellee: Sirius XM Radio Inc.
Objector: Linda Mrosko, Crutchfield Stephen, Krueger D. Scott and others
Objector - Appellant: Michael Hartleib and Brian David Goe
Blessing v. Sirius XM Radio Inc.
as 11-3834
Plaintiff - Appellee: Carl Blessing, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Edward A. Scerbo, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, John Cronin, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant - Appellee: Sirius XM Radio Inc.
Objector: Nicolas Martin, Linda Mrosko, Crutchfield Stephen and others
Objector - Appellant: Jason M. Hawkins, Sheila Massie and John Sullivan
Blessing v. Sirius XM Radio Inc.
as 11-3729
Plaintiff - Appellee: Carl Blessing, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Edward A. Scerbo, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, John Cronin, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant: Sirius XM Radio Inc.
Objector: Nicolas Martin, Linda Mrosko, Crutchfield Stephen and others
Objector - Appellant: Joel Broida
Blessing v. Sirius XM Radio Inc.
as 11-3696
Plaintiff - Appellee: Carl Blessing, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Edward A. Scerbo, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, John Cronin, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant: Sirius XM Radio Inc.
Objector: Nicolas Martin, Linda Mrosko, Crutchfield Stephen and others
Objector - Appellant: Marvin Union, Adam Falkner, Jill Piazza and others
United States of America v. Maylor (Parker)
as 11-2886
Appellee USA: United States of America
Defendant: Peter Maylor, AKA Pete, Glenn Smith, AKA Tommy, Luis Montas and others
Defendant - Appellant: Donald Parker, AKA Muff, AKA Muffin
United States of America v. Clarkson Auto Electric, Inc.
as 11-594
Plaintiff - Appellant: United States of America
Defendant: James Noto, Daniel Streff, Thomas Randall and others
Defendant - Appellee: Clarkson Auto Electric, Inc., Matthew Lavilla and Gerald Fretto
United States of America v. Clarkson Auto Electric, Inc.
as 11-594
Plaintiff / Appellant: United States of America
Defendant / Appellee: Clarkson Auto Electric, Inc., Matthew Lavilla and Gerald Fretto
Defendant: James Noto, Daniel Streff, Thomas Randall and others
Raphael Quinones v. Plaza Construction Corp.
as 10-4469
Plaintiff: John Montalvo, Marion S. Mishkin, of counsel Noice of appearance to Sacks & Sacks, Phyllis Costarella and others
Plaintiff - Appellee: Robert Gallagher, Maureen Rodriguez, Rosario Gallagher and others
Plaintiff - Appellee-Cross-Appellant: Frank Squicciarini, Michelle Squicciarini, Daniel Leonard and others
Defendant - Appellant: City of New York, AMEC Construction Management, Inc., AMEC Earth & Environmental, Inc. and others
Defendant - Appellant-Cross-Appellee: A Russo Wrecking, Inc.
United States of America v. Maylor (Gladney)
as 10-3498
Appellee USA: United States of America
Defendant: Peter Maylor, AKA Pete, Glenn Smith, AKA Tommy, Luis Montas and others
Defendant - Appellant: Aleck Gladney and Guillermo Rijo

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?