Other Statutes Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Cases 41 - 50 of 59
United States of America v. Allstate Insurance Company We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-705
Plaintiff - Appellant: United States of America, ex rel. J. Michael Hayes
Defendant - Appellee: Allstate Insurance Company, Daimler Chrysler Insurance Company, Erie Insurance Company of New York and others
Defendant: Allstate Corporation, CastlePoint National Insurance Company, Specialty Underwriters Alliance, Inc. and others
Shew v. Malloy
as 14-319
Amicus Curiae: Douglas Hall, Law Enforcement Action Network, State of Maryland and others
Defendant / Appellee: Reuben F. Bradford, in his official capacity as Commissioner of the Connecticut Department of Emergency Services and Public Protection, Dannel P. Malloy, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of Connecticut, Maureen Platt, in her official capacity as State's Attorney for the Waterbury Judicial District, Geographical Area No. 4 and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Stephanie Cypher, Rabbi Mitchell Rocklin, June Shew and others
Plaintiff: Stephen Holly
Haddock v. Nationwide Financial Service
as 13-3525
Petitioner: Nationwide Life Insurance Company
Defendant-Counter-Claimant: Nationwide Financial Services Incorporated
Plaintiff - Respondent: Lou Haddock, trustee of Flyte Tool & Die, Inc Deferred Compensation Plan, Peter Wiberg, Trustee, Crown Tool & Die Company Incorporated Salary Deferral Profit Sharing, Alan Gouse, Trustee, Greater Hfd Easter Seal Rehabilitation Center, Incorporated, Tax Sheltered Annuity Plan & Money Accumulation Pension Plan for the Employees of Hartford Easter Rehabilitation Center., Incorporated Trust and others
Searles v. Relic
as 13-2060
Petitioner: Suzanne M. Searles
Respondent: Peter Relic, Constance Beaudry, Lloyd Clavert and others
Searles v. West Hartford Board
as 13-1997
Petitioner: Suzanne M. Searles
Respondent: West Hartford Board of Education
Searles v. Board of Education
as 13-2005
Petitioner: Suzanne Mersereau Searles
Respondent: Paul Berkel, Natalie Schulman, Matthew Borrelli and others
Continental Casualty Company v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd'
as 13-398
Petitioner: Continental Casualty Company
Plaintiff - Respondent: Certain Underwriters at Lloyds of London, Issuing Policy Nos. 509/DL458805 and 509/DL460005, Aspen Insurance UK Ltd. and Arch Insurance Company (Europe) Ltd.
Defendant: Illinios National Insurance Company, HartFord Fire Insurance Company, Travelers Insurance Company and others
Certain Underwriters at Lloyds v. llinois National Insurance Com
as 13-389
Petitioner: Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania and Continental Casualty Company
Plaintiff - Respondent: Certain Underwriters at Lloyds of London, Issuing Policy Nos. 509/DL458805 and 509/DL460005, Aspen Insurance UK Ltd. and Arch Insurance Company (Europe) Ltd.
Defendant: Illinois National Insurance Company, Travelers Insurance Company, Great American Assurance Company and others
Emerson Enterprises, LLC v. Kenneth Crosby Acquisition Cor
as 12-4287
Plaintiff - Appellant: Emerson Enterprises, LLC
Defendant: Fireman's Insurance Company of Newark, NJ, Kenneth Crosby Acquisition Corp., Kenneth Crosby Co., Inc. and others
Defendant - Appellee: The Travelers Insurance Co., The Hartford Insurance Co., Continental Insurance Company, In its own right and as successor by merger to Firemen's Insurance Comapny of Newark, NJ and Glens Falls Insurance Co. and others
In Re: P.J., By & Through Hi
as 12-3091
Petitioner: P.J., By & Through His Parents & Next Friends Mr. & Mrs. W.J., L.G., By & Through Her Parents & Next Friends Mr. & Mrs. L.G., M.L., By & Through Parents & Next Friends Mr. & Mrs. J.L and others
Respondent: Education, Dept Of, Tirozzi, Gerald, Comm., CT Board of Ed, Regional School District 15, Board of Education, Regional School District No. 15, Board of Education and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?