Cases 1 - 10 of 49
United States of America v. Rodriguez-Gomez (Ramos-Acevedo)
as 24-1336
Defendant:
VICTOR RODRIGUEZ-GOMEZ, RAMON RAMOS-ACEVEDO, Calami and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Acevedo
as 24-67
Defendant / Appellant:
JOSE ACEVEDO and Sealed Defendant 1
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Acevedo
as 23-7803
Defendant / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER ACEVEDO and Essay
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Acevedo v. Garland
as 23-6013
Petitioner:
JOEL ESTEBAN ACEVEDO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
United States of America v. Jordan (Santos)
as 22-1714
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Keith Jordan, AKA Knowledge, Brian Hanna, AKA Zo, Katina Reed, AKA Tina and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Pedro Santos, AKA Primo
Acevedo v. Garland
as 22-6170
Petitioner:
REINA ISABEL ACEVEDO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
United States of America v. Jordan (Lopez)
as 20-3996
Defendant:
Kent Jordan, AKA KJ, AKA Curtis, Domingo Alves, AKA Mingo, Timothy Booker, AKA Book and others
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Francisco Lopez
Acevedo-Cruz v. Garland
as 21-6290
Petitioner:
CATALINA DE JESUS ACEVEDO-CRUZ, JOSE STIVEN ACEVEDO-CRUZ and G A
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
United States of America v. Jordan (Hayes)
as 21-3005
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Keith Jordan, AKA Knowledge, Brian Hanna, AKA Zo, Katina Reed, AKA Tina and others
Defendant / Appellant:
James Tyrone Hayes, AKA Ty
Acevedo Diaz v. Garland
as 21-6079
Petitioner:
SHEYLA ELISIANY ACEVEDO DIAZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL and ROBERT M. WILKINSON, ACTING UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
