Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Madej Manchanda v. Lewis
as 21-1088
Defendant / Appellee:
Susan Quintana, New York USCIS Field Office Director, Does 1-5, Andrea Lewis, Immigration Services Officer and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Rahul Manchanda and Sylwia Ewelina Madej Manchanda
Defendant:
Immigration Services Officer Lewis
Caplash v. Johnson
as 18-1523
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Jolly Manoj Caplash
Defendant - Appellant:
Jeh Johnson, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security, Kirstjen M. Nielsen, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security, Leon Rodriguez, Director, U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Service and others
Saleh v. United States of America
as 13-3955
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Tarek Youssef Hassan Saleh
Defendant - Appellee:
United States of America, c/o Attorney General, Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General of the United States, Janet Napolitano, Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-3813
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Li v. Novak
as 10-2560
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Feimei Li and Duo Cen
Defendant - Appellee:
Paul Novak, Director, Vermont Service Center, United States Immigration Services, Jonathan Scharfen, Acting Director, United States Citizenship & Immigration Services, Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney General and others
Zheng v. BCIS
as 10-1849
Petitioner:
Qiu Feng Zheng, AKA Qui Feng Zheng, AKA Ma Nan Hsuen
Respondent:
Bureau of Citizenship & Immigration Services
Henry v. Quarantillo
as 10-1264
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Leroy Anthony Henry, A# A-19-409-012
Defendant - Appellee:
Andrea Quarantillo, District Director, New York District Office of the U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services, Robert P. Weimann, Chief, Administrative Appeals Office, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services and U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
