Cases 1 - 10 of 158
Toaquiza-Tigasi v. Garland
as 24-538
Petitioner:
FRANKLIN GABRIEL TOAQUIZA-TIGASI, LUZ MYRIAM TOAQUIZA-LUTUALA and NEYMAR DAMIAN TOAQUIZA-TOAQUIZA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Baram v. Doe
as 24-599
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN BARAM, an individual
Defendant:
JANE DOE, an individual, DICELLO LEVITT, fka DiCello Levitt Gutzler a law firm, THE HABA LAW FIRM P.A., a law firm and others
Westfal v. Westfal
as 24-221
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES RICHARD WESTFAL
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL FRANKLIN WESTFAL, KENNETH C. GLASSMAN, BRENNAN DOYLE and others
United States of America v. Ray
as 23-8005
Defendant:
JOSEPH WINGET and Sealed Defendant 2
Defendant / Appellant:
FRANKLIN RAY and Sealed Defendant 1
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Ayers (Smith)
as 23-7119
Defendant:
DERRICK AYERS, BERMON CLARKE, NIA GOVAN and others
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMEL SMITH
United States of America v. Parker (Fox)
as 23-6409
Defendant:
DAVID PARKER, EUGENE BROOKS, STEVEN SMITH and others
Defendant / Appellant:
PAUL FOX, JONATHAN BAKER, Israel Chambers and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Najarro Morales v. Garland
as 23-6257
Petitioner:
FRANKLIN ANTONIO NAJARRO MORALES
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
United States of America v. Aguiar
as 23-6443
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
WILLIAM MURRAY, HERBERT LAWRENCE, BRIAN TAHAIR and others
Defendant / Appellant:
STEPHEN AGUIAR
Boconsaca Guartasaca v. Garland
as 23-6576
Petitioner:
FRANKLIN GIOVANI BOCONSACA GUARTASACA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Marquez Martinez v. Garland
as 22-6117
Petitioner:
ENA MARITZA MARQUEZ MARTINEZ, FRANKLIN JAVIER MEDINA MARQUEZ and DANIEL ALEXANDER ROMERO MARQUEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
