Cases 1 - 10 of 61
Komatsu v. Urban Pathways, Inc.
as 23-654
Petitioner:
Towaki Komatsu
Respondent:
Urban Pathways, Inc., being sued in their individual and official capacities, Daniels Norelli Cecere & Travel PC, being sued in their individual and official capacities, Neighborhood Association for Inter-Cultural Affairs, Inc., being sued in their individual and official capacities and others
United States of America v. Gill
as 22-2969
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Joseph Gill
Gill v. United States of America
as 21-2990
Petitioner / Appellant:
Tariq Gill
Respondent / Appellee:
United States of America
Julian v. MetLife, Inc.
as 21-2209
Petitioner:
Tonya Gill, Stephanie McKinney, Harris Kimberly and others
Respondent:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Henry v. Department of Veteran Affairs
as 21-1716
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Alfred G. Henry
Defendant / Appellee:
Robert A. McDonald, Secretary
Defendant:
Department of Veteran Affairs, Dr. Adam Wolkin, David Matalon, M.D., Staff Psychiatrist and others
Neville McFarlane v. Altice USA, Inc.
as 21-1290
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Neville McFarlane, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, John Frontera, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Ronnie Gill and others
Plaintiff:
Brittany Wiley, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellant:
Altice USA, Inc., a New York Corporation
McCarroll v. Gill
as 21-1094
Defendant / Appellee:
Dana Ng, Mr., Raytheon, William Tong, Mr., Attorney General, Connecticut, Lamont, Governor, State of Connecticut and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Margaret McCarroll
Jansen v. International Flavors & Fragra
as 21-1076
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Menora Mivtachim Insurance Ltd., Clal Insurance Company Ltd., Menora Mivtachim and the Federation of Engineers Provident Fund Management Ltd. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Ori Yehudai, Guy Gill, Andreas Fibig and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Jansen, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Geiss v. The Weinstein Company Holdings
as 21-1011
Plaintiff:
Melissa Thompson, Nannette Klatt, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Sara Ann Thomas, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, AKA Sarah Ann Masse and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Nancy Ashbrooke, Richard Koenigsberg, Miramax Film NY, LLC and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Larissa Gomes, Melissa Sagemiller, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Nannette May, FKA Nannette Klatt and others
Defendant:
Miramax Film Corp. and Miramax, LLC
Geiss v. The Weinstein Company Holdings
as 21-1007
Plaintiff:
Melissa Thompson, Nannette Klatt, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Sara Ann Thomas, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, AKA Sarah Ann Masse and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Nancy Ashbrooke, Richard Koenigsberg, Miramax Film NY, LLC and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Larissa Gomes, Melissa Sagemiller, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Nannette May, FKA Nannette Klatt and others
Defendant:
Miramax Film Corp. and Miramax, LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
