Other Statutes Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Cases 1 - 10 of 84
United States of America v. Hage (Salim)
as 23-6185
Defendant: WADIH EL-HAGE, FAZUL ABDULLAH MOHAMMED, MOHAMED SADEEK ODEH and others
Defendant / Appellant: MAMDOUH MAHMUD SALIM, Abu Hajer al Iraqi and Abu Hajer
Not Yet Classified: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Balouchzehi
as 23-7609
Defendant / Appellant: MALEK MOHAMMAD BALOUCHZEHI, Malek Khan and Sealed Defendant 1
Not Yet Classified: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Gorgeech (Niamatullah Gorgeech)
as 23-6921
Defendant: MAULABAKSH GORGEECH, Sealed Defendant 1 and Maula Baksh
Defendant / Appellant: NIAMATULLAH GORGEECH and Son of Hakeem Jamal Khan
Not Yet Classified: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Khan
as 23-6438
Not Yet Classified: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: BABAR KHAN
Defendant / Appellant: KHATIJA KHAN
Khan v. Garland
as 20-4171
Petitioner: MUZAMAL KHAN
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Baliga v. Link Motion Inc.
as 23-827
Plaintiff / Appellee: Wayne Baliga, derivatively on behalf of Link Motion Inc., FKA NQ Mobile Inc.
Defendant: Jia Lian, Xiao Yu, Link Motion Inc., FKA NQ Mobile Inc. and others
Appellee: Robert W. Seiden, 469 Seventh Avenue New York, NY 10018 (212) 523-0686
Defendant / Appellant: Vincent Wenyong Shi
Khan v. Garland
as 20-4058
Petitioner: APPEL MAHMUD KHAN
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Khan v. Garland
as 22-6326
Petitioner: MOHAMMAD MONAZIR KHAN
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Trivedi v. General Electric Company
as 23-254
Plaintiff / Appellant: Madhuri Trivedi
Defendant / Appellee: General Electric Company, GE Healthcare, Larry Culp and others
United States of America v. Khan (Khatija Khan)
as 22-1969
Appellee: United States of America
Defendant: Babar Khan
Defendant / Appellant: Khatija Khan

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?