Cases 1 - 10 of 16
New Jersey Carpenters Health F v. The Royal Bank of Scotland Gro
as 19-763
Defendant / Appellee:
Gregory S. Metz, NovaStar Mortgage Funding Trust, Series 2006-6, NovaStar Mortgage Funding Trust, Series 2006-3 and others
Defendant:
The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. and Moodys Investors Service, Inc
Not Yet Classified:
Federal Housing Finance Agency, as Conservator of Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation
Plaintiff / Appellee:
New Jersey Carpenters Health Fund, on Behalf of Itself and All Others Similarly Situated
Appellant:
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation
New Jersey Carpenters Health F v. The Royal Bank of Scotland Gro
as 19-795
Defendant / Appellee:
Gregory S. Metz, NovaStar Mortgage Funding Trust, Series 2006-6, NovaStar Mortgage Funding Trust, Series 2006-3 and others
Defendant:
The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. and Moodys Investors Service, Inc
Plaintiff / Appellee:
New Jersey Carpenters Health Fund, on Behalf of Itself and All Others Similarly Situated
Appellant:
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation
New Jersey Carpenters Health F v. The Royal Bank of Scotland Gro
as 17-2859
Plaintiff - Appellee:
New Jersey Carpenters Health Fund, on Behalf of Itself and All Others Similarly Situated
Appellant:
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation
Defendant - Appellee:
The Royal Bank of Scotland Group PLC, Greenwich Capital Holdings, Inc., Greenwich Capital Markets, Inc., DBA RBS Greenwich Capital and others
Defendant:
Moodys Investors Service, Inc and McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
Reese v. Bahash
as 13-4039
Plaintiff:
Claude A. Reese, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Boca Raton Firefighters and Police Pension Fund
Defendant - Appellee:
Robert J. Bahash, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. and Harold McGraw, III
IN RE: Merrill Lynch &Co., Inc
as 13-1980
Plaintiff:
Robert Berzin, Michael Bonde, Ronald Levy and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Louisiana Pacific Corp.
Defendant - Appellee:
FGIC Corporation, Merrill Lynch & Co, Inc., Financial Guaranty Insurance Co. and others
Tsereteli v. Residential Asset Securitizati
as 12-4411
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Vaszurele Ltd. and Vasili Tsereteli, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant:
Residential Asset Securitization Trust, 2006-A8, Moody's Investors Service, Inc. and McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
Defendant - Appellant:
Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC
Tsereteli v. Residential Asset Securitizati
as 12-2790
Plaintiff:
Vasili Tsereteli, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Petitioner:
Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC
Respondent:
Vaszurele Ltd.
Defendant:
Moody's Investors Service, Inc., McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc and Residential Asset Securitization Trust 2006-A8
The Authors Guild v. Google, Inc.
as 12-2402
Plaintiff:
Herbert Mitgang, Daniel Hoffman, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Paul Dickson and others
Petitioner:
Google, Inc.
Plaintiff - Respondent:
Betty Miles, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Joseph Goulden, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Jim Bouton and others
Public Employees' Retirement S v. Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
as 12-2366
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Public Employees' Retirement System of Mississippi, Individually, on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant:
McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., Moody's Investors Service, Inc., Fitch Inc. and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., Goldman Sachs Mortgage Company, GS Mortgage Securities Corp. and others
New Jersey Carpenters Health F v. The Royal Bank of Scotland Gro
as 12-1707
Plaintiff - Appellant:
New Jersey Carpenters Health Fund, on Behalf of Itself and All Others Similarly Situated
Defendant:
Moodys Investors Service, Inc and The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
Defendant - Appellee:
The Royal Bank of Scotland Group, PLC, Greenwich Capital Holdings, Inc., Greenwich Capital Markets, Inc., DBA RBS Greenwich Capital and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
