Cases 1 - 10 of 38
Paul White v. Immigration and Customs Enforc
as 21-3056
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Paul White
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, (ICE), Seven Unknown DOE Agents of DHS/CDF/Oasis/Global Tel Link et al. and United States of America
Maradiaga v. Decker
as 21-1184
Respondent:
Alejandro N. Mayorkas, in his official capacity as Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Merrick B. Garland, in his official capacity as Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice, Tae Johnson, in his official capacity as Senior Official Performing the Duties of the Director of United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Petitioner:
Javier Castillo Maradiaga
Van Stuyvesant v. Barr
as 21-583
Defendant / Appellee:
Francis Cassina, Director United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Chad F. Wolf, Acting Secretary United States Department of Homeland Security, Christopher Wrey, Director Federal Bureau of Investigation Department of Justice and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Curtis Van Stuyvesant, United States ex. rel
Vazquez Perez v. Decker
as 21-319
Respondent / Appellee:
Robert M. Wilkinson, in his official capacity as Acting Attorney General of the United States, United States Department of Justice, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
Uriel Vazquez Perez, on his own behalf and on behalf of others similarly situated
Vazquez Perez v. Decker
as 21-192
Respondent:
United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Robert M. Wilkinson, in his official capacity as Acting Attorney General of the United States, United States Department of Justice and others
Petitioner:
Uriel Vazquez Perez, on his own behalf and on behalf of others similarly situated
Knight First Amendment Institu v. United States Department of Ho
as 20-3837
Defendant:
United States Department of Homeland Security, United States Customs and Border Protection and United States Department of Justice
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University
Defendant / Appellant:
United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services and United States Department of State
State of New York
as 20-2622
Defendant / Appellant:
Kevin McAleenan, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of Homeland Security, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Matthew Albence, in his official capacity as Acting Director of United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
State of New York and Eric Gonzalez, Esq., in his official capacity as the District Attorney of Kings County (Brooklyn)
Velesaca v. Wolf
as 20-2153
Petitioner:
Jose L. Velesaca, on behalf of himself and on behalf of all others similarly situated and Abraham Carlo Uzategui Navarro, on behalf of himself and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Respondent:
Matthew Albence, in his official capacity as the Acting Director for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Thomas R. Decker, in his official capacity as New York Field Office Director for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Arana v. Barr
as 20-2133
Respondent:
Acting Secretary Kevin McAleenan, United States Department of Homeland Security, Acting Director Matthew Albence, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Director Thomas Decker, New York Field Office Director for United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Petitioner:
Pedro Arana
Arana v. Barr
as 20-2080
Respondent / Appellee:
Acting Director Matthew Albence, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, William P. Barr, Attorney General of the United States, Director Thomas Decker, New York Field Office Director for United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
Pedro Arana
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
