Cases 11 - 20 of 864
Park Avenue Podiatric Care, P.L.L.C. v. Cigna Health and Life Insurance Company
as 23-1135
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Park Avenue Podiatric Care, P.L.L.C.
Defendant / Appellee:
Cigna Health and Life Insurance Company
Park Avenue Podiatric Care, P.L.L.C. v. Cigna Health and Life Insurance Company
as 23-1134
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Park Avenue Podiatric Care, P.L.L.C.
Defendant / Appellee:
Cigna Health and Life Insurance Company
Grosso v. AT&T Pension Benefit Plan
as 22-1701
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Vincent C. Grosso, On Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated and Patricia M. Wing, On Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated
Defendant / Appellee:
AT&T Pension Benefit Plan and AT&T Services, Inc., as Plan Administrator
McCutcheon v. Colgate-Palmolive Co.
as 20-3225
Defendant / Appellant:
Daniel Marsili, Colgate-Palmolive Co., Employee Relations Committee of Colgate-Palmolive Co. and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Rebecca McCutcheon, On behalf of themselves and on behalf of all others similarly situated and Paul Caufield, On behalf of themselves and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Vellali v. Yale University
as 23-1172
Plaintiff:
Ranay P. Cirillo, Individually and as representative of a class of participants and beneficiaries on behalf of the Yale University Retirement Account Plan and Tara Heard, Individually and as representative of a class of participants and beneficiaries on behalf of the Yale University Retirement Account Plan
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Joseph Vellali, Individually and as representative of a class of participants and beneficiaries on behalf of the Yale University Retirement Account Plan, Nancy S. Lowers, Individually and as representative of a class of participants and beneficiaries on behalf of the Yale University Retirement Account Plan, Jan M. Taschner, Individually and as representative of a class of participants and beneficiaries on behalf of the Yale University Retirement Account Plan and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Yale University, Michael A. Peel and The Retirement Plan Fiduciary Committee
Johnson v. The Hartford
as 23-1140
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Melinda L. Johnson
Defendant / Appellee:
The Hartford
Singh v. Deloitte LLP
as 23-1108
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Rupinder Singh, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Jeffrey S. Popkin, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Joni Walker, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Deloitte LLP, The Board of Directors of Deloitte LLP, The Retirement Plan Committee of Deloitte LLP and others
Perlman v. General Electric
as 23-1099
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Carol Perlman
Defendant / Appellee:
General Electric, GE Healthcare, H. Lawrence Culp, Jr. and others
Aponte v. 5th Ave. Kings Fruit & Vegetables Corp.
as 22-2047
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Leonardo Aponte
Defendant:
20/20 Grocery and Deli Corp.
Defendant / Appellant:
5th Ave. Kings Fruit & Vegetables Corp., DBA 5th Ave. Kings Supermarket and Adel Kassim
Vellali v. Yale University
as 23-1082
Plaintiff:
Ranay P. Cirillo, Individually and as representative of a class of participants and beneficiaries on behalf of the Yale University Retirement Account Plan and Tara Heard, Individually and as representative of a class of participants and beneficiaries on behalf of the Yale University Retirement Account Plan
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Joseph Vellali, Individually and as representative of a class of participants and beneficiaries on behalf of the Yale University Retirement Account Plan, Nancy S. Lowers, Individually and as representative of a class of participants and beneficiaries on behalf of the Yale University Retirement Account Plan, Jan M. Taschner, Individually and as representative of a class of participants and beneficiaries on behalf of the Yale University Retirement Account Plan and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Yale University, Michael A. Peel and The Retirement Plan Fiduciary Committee
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
