Cases 21 - 30 of 51
UFCW Local One Pension Fund v. 15 McFadden Road, Inc.
as 14-2487
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UFCW Local One Pension Fund, and its Trustees: Frank C. DeRiso, John P. Barrett, Eric Glathar, Raymond Wardynski, Robert Boehlert, and Kristine Wydro
Defendant:
15 McFadden Road, Inc.
Defendant - Appellee:
Enivel Properties, LLC
Chang v. Neo Sushi Studio Inc.
as 14-1626
Plaintiff:
May Leng Chan, Individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, Michele Chan, Individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, Johnny Shih, Individually and on behalf of others similarly situated and others
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant - Appellee:
Kwo Shin Chang, Individually and on behalf of others similarly situated and Steven Wong, Individually and on behalf of others similarly situated
Movant - Appellant:
Michael K. Chong
Defendant-Counter-Claimant:
Neo Sushi Studio Inc. and Vinch C. Ly
In Re: JPMorgan Chase and Co.
as 14-1514
Plaintiff:
Gregory Scrydoff, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Mary Loeza and Matt Ward
Defendant:
John Does 1-10 and John Does 1-100
Defendant - Appellee:
JPMorgan Chase & Co., JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Bernadette J. Ulissi and others
Scerba v. Allied Pilots Association
as 14-1006
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Larry Scerba, William A. Alexander, John Babuini and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Allied Pilots Association
Gill v. Bausch & Lomb Supplemental
as 14-1058
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Daniel E. Gill, Thomas C. McDermott and Jay T. Holmes
Defendant - Appellant:
Bausch & Lomb Supplemental Retirement Income Plan I, Bausch & Lomb Incorporated and Compensation Committee of the Bausch & Lomb Board of Directors
Garcia v. K.G.B. Contracting Corp.
as 14-533
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Julio Garcia, Pedro Santos, Agustin Chevez Rodas and others
Defendant - Appellee:
K.G.B. Contracting Corp., K.G. Industries, Inc., AKA K.G. Construction Associates, Inc., Bansi K. Shah and others
Jacob v. Duane Reade, Inc.
as 13-3873
Plaintiff:
Ousmane Diop, Forbes M. Lewis, Sanjeev Farid and others
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Mani Jacob, Individually and on behalf of all others similary situated and Lesleena Mars, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant:
Walgreen Co.
Defendant - Appellant:
Duane Reade Holdings, Inc. and Duane Reade, Inc.
In Re: Bank of New York Mellon
as 13-3064
Plaintiff:
State of Oregon By and Through the Oregon State Treasurer on Behalf of the Common School Fund and, Together with the Oregon Public Employee Retirement Board, on Behalf of the Oregon Public Employee Re, Louisiana Municipal Police Employees' Retirement System, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Isabel F. Sansano, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Marilyn Clark, Derivatively on behalf of The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation and Iron Workets Mid-South Pension Fund, Derivatively on behalf of The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation
Defendant - Appellee:
Gerald L. Hassell, Arthur Certosimo, James P. Palermo and others
Coulter v. Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorpora
as 13-2504
Plaintiff - Appellant:
G. Kenneth Coulter, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, John Siefken, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Gregory Major, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated, Morgan Stanley, The Investment Committee of The Morgan Stanley 401(k) plan and others
In re Morgan Stanley ERISA Lit
as 13-2509
Plaintiff:
Elena Ramos and Alvin Saini
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Carolyn Egan, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, C. Kenneth Coulter, John Siefken and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Morgan Stanely & Co. Incorporated, Morgan Stanley, The Investment Committee of the Morgan Stanley 401k Plan, FKA The Morgan Stanley DPSP/Start Plan and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
