Cases 31 - 40 of 61
Navarrete v. Ranjha Cleaners inc.
as 16-3277
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Ernesto Navarrete, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated
Defendant:
John Doe
Defendant - Appellant:
Ranjha Cleaners Inc, DBA Ranjha Cleaners, Soho Cleaners, Inc., DBA Soho Cleaners, Mulberry Street Cleaners Inc, DBA Mulberry Cleaners and others
In Re: JPMorgan Chase and Co.
as 14-1514
Plaintiff:
Gregory Scrydoff, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Mary Loeza and Matt Ward
Defendant:
John Does 1-10 and John Does 1-100
Defendant - Appellee:
JPMorgan Chase & Co., JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Bernadette J. Ulissi and others
Zhou v. Lan Sheng Restaurant Inc.
as 14-1239
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Zhuoshi Zhou, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated
Defendant:
John Doe and Jane Doe
Defendant - Appellant:
Lan Sheng Restaurant Inc., DBA Lan Sheng Szechuan Restaurant, Bin Sheng Yan and Lam Yan
Okun v. Montefiore Medical Center
as 13-3928
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Alexander Okun, MD
Defendant - Appellee:
Montefiore Medical Center, Montefiore Severance Plan and John Doe, administrator of the Severance Plan
Coulter v. Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorpora
as 13-2504
Plaintiff - Appellant:
G. Kenneth Coulter, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, John Siefken, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Gregory Major, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated, Morgan Stanley, The Investment Committee of The Morgan Stanley 401(k) plan and others
In re Morgan Stanley ERISA Lit
as 13-2509
Plaintiff:
Elena Ramos and Alvin Saini
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Carolyn Egan, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, C. Kenneth Coulter, John Siefken and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Morgan Stanely & Co. Incorporated, Morgan Stanley, The Investment Committee of the Morgan Stanley 401k Plan, FKA The Morgan Stanley DPSP/Start Plan and others
Shiu v. New Peking Taste Inc.
as 13-2488
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Man Wei Shiu, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated and Dan Feng Lin, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated
Appellant:
Jung & Associates
Defendant:
New Peking Taste Inc., DBA New Peking Taste Restaurant, Gen Xu Shu, Xiao Mei Wang and others
Wilson v. Pasquale's Damarino's, Inc.
as 13-1523
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Ksenia Artates, Abdoulaye Ndiaye, Santiago Ortiz and others
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant - Appellee:
Genesis Wilson, on behalf of himself and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Aliaksandra Kulesh, on behalf of herself and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Natalia Zemtsova, on behalf of herself and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Defendant-Counter-Claimant - Appellant:
Pasquale's Damarino's, Inc., Pasquale Marino, Izabela Marino and others
Defendant-Counter-Claimant:
John Doe, AKA Dr. Salvatore
Third-Party-Defendant:
Salvatore Vassallo, Vassallo Insurance Agency and Paychex, Inc.
Defendant:
Fred Marino and 220 West Restaurant Corp.
De La Rosa v. Frandora Associates, Inc.
as 13-1539
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Amado De La Rosa and Domingo De La Rosa
Defendant:
Frandora Associates, Inc., Francisco Dominguez and John Does, #1-10
Defendant - Appellant:
Man 371 LLC, Solar Realty Management Corp. and Mehmet Capin
Chenensky v. New York Life Insurance Co.
as 13-1458
Plaintiff - Appellant-Cross-Appellee:
Brian Chenensky, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
John Does, 150 (said names being fictitious individuals) and ABC Corporations, 150 (said names being fictitious companies, partnership, joint ventures and/or corporation)
Defendant - Appellee-Cross-Appellant:
New York Life Insurance Co., New York Life Insurance and Annuity Corp., NYLife Insurance Co. of Arizona and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
