Labor Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Cases 1 - 10 of 40
Leslie v. Starbucks Corporation
as 23-1194
Petitioner / Appellant: Linda M. Leslie, Regional Director of the Third Region of the National Labor Relations Board for and on behalf of the National Labor Relations Board
Respondent / Appellee: Starbucks Corporation
Singh v. Deloitte LLP
as 23-1108
Plaintiff / Appellant: Rupinder Singh, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Jeffrey S. Popkin, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Joni Walker, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellee: Deloitte LLP, The Board of Directors of Deloitte LLP, The Retirement Plan Committee of Deloitte LLP and others
Fitzsimons v. New York City District Council of Carpenters and J
as 23-815
Plaintiff / Appellant: Peter Fitzsimons, Regina Ann Devlin Fitzsimons, Caitlin Patricia Fitzsimons and others
Defendant / Appellee: New York City District Council of Carpenters and Joiners of America, New York City District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund, New York City District Council of Carpenters Welfare Fund and others
Pessin v. JPMorgan Chase U.S. Benefits Executive
as 23-25
Plaintiff / Appellant: Joseph Pessin, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee: JPMorgan Chase U.S. Benefits Executive, as Plan Administrator of the JPMorgan Chase Retirement Plan, Board of Directors of JPMorgan Chase Bank and J.P. Morgan Chase & Company and JPMorgan Chase Retirement Plan
Drew-King v. Amazon.com Services LLC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 22-3182
Petitioner: Kathy Drew King, Regional Director of Region 29 of the National Labor Relations Board, for and on behalf of the National Labor Relations Board
Respondent: Amazon.com Services LLC
Ferguson v. Ruane Cuniff & Goldfarb Inc.
as 22-275
Plaintiff / Appellee: Michael L. Ferguson, Myrl C. Jeffcoat and Deborah Smith, on behalf of the DST Systems, Inc. 401(K) Profit Sharing Plan
Defendant / Appellee: DST Systems, Inc., The Advisory Committee of the DST Systems, Inc. 401(K) Profit Sharing Plan and The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of DST Systems, Inc.
Defendant: Ruane Cunniff & Goldfarb Inc., George L. Argyros, Tim Bahr and others
Intervenor: James DuCharme, Robert Canfield, Bonnie Kartz and others
Fernbach v. Arbor Recycling and Arbor Logi
as 17-3928
Plaintiff - Appellant: Karen P. Fernbach, Regional Director, Reigon 2, National Labor Relations Board and on Behalf of the National Labor Relations Board
Defendant - Appellee: Arbor Recycling, as a Single Employer and Arbor Logistics, as a Single Employer
Cooper v. DST Systems, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-2805
Plaintiff - Appellant: Clive V. Cooper, individually and as a representative of a class of similarly situated plan participants, on behalf of the DST Systems, Inc. 401(K) Profit Sharing Plan
Defendant - Appellee: Ruane Cunniff & Goldfarb Inc.
Defendant: DST Systems, Inc., The Advisory Committee of the DST Systems, Inc. 401(K) Profit Sharing Plan, The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of DST Systems, Inc. and others
Vayani v. Pohani
as 17-2767
Plaintiff - Appellant: Abdul Khaliq Vayani, Security Guard, 146 West 29th Street Owners Corporation
Defendant - Appellee: 146 West 29th Street Owners Corporation, Berik Management, Managing 146 Building, President Rikin Sheth, Berik Management and others
Defendant: Tim Rockholt, Service Employment International Union SEIU Washington, Michael Geffner, Union 32 BJ Counsels and others
Dixon v. MacPacken
as 17-8
Plaintiff - Appellee-Cross-Appellant: James G. Paulsen, Regional Director of Region 29 of the National Labor Relations Board, for and on behalf of the National Labor Relations Board
Defendant - Appellant-Cross-Appellee: Primeflight Aviation Services, Inc.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?