Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Perlman v. General Electric
as 23-1099
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Carol Perlman
Defendant / Appellee:
General Electric, GE Healthcare, H. Lawrence Culp, Jr. and others
Aracich v. The Board of Trustees of The Employee Benefit Fund
as 22-2544
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Matthew Aracich
Defendant / Appellee:
The Board of Trustees of The Employee Benefit Funds of Heat & Frost Insulators Local 12, The Employee Benefit Funds of Heat & Frost Insulators Local 12, The Board of Trustees of The Pension Fund of Heat And Frost Insulators Local 12 Plan and others
Urbina Palacios v. Alifine Dining Inc.
as 22-575
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Miguel Urbina Palacios, on behalf of himself and all other persons similarly situated
Defendant:
John Does #1-10
Defendant / Appellant:
Alifine Dining Inc., DBA Nanking, Omsai Foods Inc., DBA Nanking, Tulip NYC Inc., AKA Nanking and others
Neri v. Abi Japanese Restaurant, Inc.
as 22-227
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Marcos Leon Neri, on behalf of himself and all other persons similarly situated and Emilio Islas Concha
Defendant:
John Does, #1-10
Defendant / Appellant:
Abi Japanese Restaurant, Inc., DBA Abi Sushi, Abumi Japanese Cuisine Inc. and Kun Lin Chen
Tang v. Wing Keung Enterprises, Inc.
as 17-1862
Plaintiff:
Jian Liu
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Chaohui Tang, Jianlin Li and Qingze Liu, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Defendant:
John Does 1-10, Jane Does 1-10 and Company ABC, 1-10
Defendant - Appellant:
Wing Keung Enterprises, Inc. and Keung Chan
The National Retirement Fund v. Caesars Entertainment
as 17-249
Plaintiff - Appellee:
The National Retirement Fund, each on behalf of the Legacy Plan of the National Retirement Fund and Richard N. Rust, in his capacity as Fund Manager, each on behalf of the Legacy Plan of the National Retirement Fund
Defendant:
John Does, 1-10 all other trades or businesses under common control with Caesars Entertainment Corporation and Caesars Entertainment Resort Properties, LLC that have not filed for bankruptcy
Defendant - Appellant:
Caesars Entertainment Corporation and Caesars Entertainment Resort Properties, LLC
The National Retirement Fund v. Caesars Entertainment
as 16-3939
Plaintiff - Appellee:
The National Retirement Fund, each on behalf of the Legacy Plan of the National Retirement Fund and Richard N. Rust, in his capacity as Fund Manager, each on behalf of the Legacy Plan of the National Retirement Fund
Defendant:
John Does, 1-10 all other trades or businesses under common control with Caesars Entertainment Corporation and Caesars Entertainment Resort Properties, LLC that have not filed for bankruptcy
Defendant - Appellant:
Caesars Entertainment Corporation and Caesars Entertainment Resort Properties, LLC
In Re: JPMorgan Chase and Co.
as 14-1514
Plaintiff:
Gregory Scrydoff, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Mary Loeza and Matt Ward
Defendant:
John Does 1-10 and John Does 1-100
Defendant - Appellee:
JPMorgan Chase & Co., JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Bernadette J. Ulissi and others
Coulter v. Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorpora
as 13-2504
Plaintiff - Appellant:
G. Kenneth Coulter, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, John Siefken, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Gregory Major, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated, Morgan Stanley, The Investment Committee of The Morgan Stanley 401(k) plan and others
In re Morgan Stanley ERISA Lit
as 13-2509
Plaintiff:
Elena Ramos and Alvin Saini
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Carolyn Egan, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, C. Kenneth Coulter, John Siefken and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Morgan Stanely & Co. Incorporated, Morgan Stanley, The Investment Committee of the Morgan Stanley 401k Plan, FKA The Morgan Stanley DPSP/Start Plan and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
