Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Agerbrink v. Model Service LLC
as 18-1471
Plaintiff:
Yelena Lukin, Patrick Christopher Williams, Henry A. Romero Rodriguez and others
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant - Appellant:
Eva Agerbrink, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situtated
Defendant-Counter-Claimant - Appellee:
Model Service LLC, DBA MSA Models, Susan Levine and William Ivers
Romero v. Anjedev Enterprise
as 17-1274
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Carmelo Romero, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and Juan Romero, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant:
John Doe Corporation, DBA Amma and Suvir Saran
Defendant - Appellant:
Anjedev Enterprises, DBA Amma, Anju Sharma and Devendra Sharma
Romero v. Anjedev Enterprise
as 17-1276
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Carmelo Romero, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and Juan Romero, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant:
John Doe Corporation, DBA Amma and Suvir Saran
Defendant - Appellant:
Anjedev Enterprises, DBA Amma, Anju Sharma and Devendra Sharma
Romero v. DHL Express (USA), Inc.
as 17-332
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Mauricio Baez Romero
Defendant - Appellee:
DHL Express (USA), Inc.
Murphy v. LaJaunie
as 16-3114
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Ethan Murphy, Stephanie Castillo, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, Christopher L. Scott, on behalf of themselves and others similiarly situated and others
Defendant:
La Boucherie Inc., 15 John Corp., LHLM Group, Corporation, AKA Brasserie Les Halles New York and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Philippe LaJaunie
Pippins v. KPMG LLP
as 13-889
Plaintiff:
Lisa B. Fraley, Stephen Marsala, Jr., Joshua Adam Mandelberger and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Kyle Pippins, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Jamie Schindler, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and Edward Lambert
Defendant - Appellee:
KPMG LLP
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
