Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Oriska Corporation v. Highgate LTC Management, LLC
as 22-1155
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Oriska Corporation, individually and derivatively to Carrier-Defendant Oriska Insurance Company
Defendant:
Highgate LTC Management, LLC, Employer-Defendant, DBA Northwoods Rehabilitaion & Extended Care, Eugene Nachamkin, Owner-Defendant, Diana R. Koehler, Owner-Defendant and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Donna Hodge, as the Class Representative of a Class of Employees of Employer Defendants as the interests of the Class may appear, Class Defendant, Annette Hall, as the Class Representative of a Class of Employees of Employer Defendants as the interests of the Class may appear, Class Defendant, Karen Grant Williams, as the Class Representative of a Class of Employees of Employer Defendants as the interests of the Class may appear, Class Defendant and others
Oriska Corporation v. Troy Operating Co. LLC
as 22-1139
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Oriska Corporation, individually and derivatively to Carrier Defendant Oriska Insurance Company
Defendant:
Troy Operating Co. LLC, (Diamond) Employer-Defendant, Bent Philipson, Owner-Defendant, The Philipson Family Trust, Prohibited Transaction Defendant and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Donna Hodge, as the Class Representative of a Class of Employees of Employer Defendants as the interest of the Class may appear, Class Defendant, Annette Hall, as the Class Representative of a Class of Employees of Employer Defendants as the interest of the Class may appear, Class Defendant, Karen Grant Williams, as the Class Representative of a Class of Employees of Employer Defendants as the interest of the Class may appear, Class Defendant and others
Oriska Corporation v. Niskayuna Operating Co., LLC
as 22-1126
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Oriska Corporation, individually and derivatively to Carrier-Defendant Oriska Insurance Company
Defendant:
Niskayuna Operating Co., LLC, Employer-Defendant, Bent Philipson, Owner-Defendant, The Philipson Family Trust, Prohibited Transaction Defendants and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Donna Hodge, Class Representatives of a Class of Employees of Employer Defendants as the interests of the Class may appearClass Defendant, Annette Hall, Representatives of a Class of Employees of Employer Defendants as the interests of the Class may appear, Class Defendant, Karen Grant Williams, as the Class Representatives of a Class of Employees of Employer Defendants as the interests of the Class may appear, Class Defendant and others
Plutzer v. Bankers Trust Company of South
as 22-561
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Edward Plutzer, on behalf of the Tharanco Group, Inc. Employee Stock Ownership Plan, and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
Bankers Trust Company of South Dakota, a South Dakota Limited Liability Corporation, Haresh T. Tharani, Michael J. Setola and others
Hong v. Quest International Limousine,
as 22-520
Plaintiff:
Yong M Koo, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, Scott Choi, Scott Kyung Choi and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Sung Eik Hong, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, Kevin K Lee, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, Yoon S. Kim, Individually and on behalf of others similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Quest International Limousine, Inc., Mangil Park and James Park
Bay Park Center for Nursing an v. Rehabilitation LLC
as 21-1554
Defendant:
Benjamin Fishoff, Robert Fensterman, Owner Operator Defendant, Whiteman Osterman & Hanna, LLP, Prohibited Transaction Defendant and others
Intervenor:
Bayview Home for Adults, Allstate ASO, The Plaza Rehab & Nursing and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Caring Family Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, DBA New Surfside Nursing Home LLC, Brookhaven Rehabilitation and Health Care Center LLC, DBA Brookhaven Rehabilitation & Health Care Center LLC, Golden Gate Rehabilitation and Health Care Center, DBA Golden Gate Rehabilitation & Health Care Center LLC and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Alexi Arias, as the Class Representatives of a Class of Employees of Employer Defendants in Intervention as the interests of the Class may appear, Class Defendant, Karen Grant Williams, Class Defendant, Annette Hall, Class Defendant and others
Giantonio v. Chicago Bridge & Iron Company
as 18-2034
Plaintiff:
John J. Giantonio, on behalf of the Chicago Bridge & Iron Savings Plan, The Shaw Group Inc. 401(k) Plan, himself and a class consisting of similarly situated participants of the Plans
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Ramesh C. Kinra
Defendant:
John Does 1-20 and Richard Roes, 1-20
Defendant - Appellant:
Chicago Bridge & Iron Company, Investment Committee, Plan Administrator and others
Giantonio v. Chicago Bridge & Iron Company
as 18-1886
Plaintiff:
John J. Giantonio, on behalf of the Chicago Bridge & Iron Savings Plan, The Shaw Group Inc. 401(k) Plan, himself and a class consisting of similarly situated participants of the Plans
Plaintiff - Appellant-Cross-Appellee:
Ramesh C. Kinra
Defendant - Appellee:
Travis Stricker
Defendant - Appellee-Cross-Appellant:
Chicago Bridge & Iron Company, Investment Committee, Plan Administrator and others
Defendant:
John Does 1-20 and Richard Roes, 1-20
Walsh v. International Brotherhood of E
as 17-712
Plaintiff:
James Worden
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Timothy Walsh
Defendant - Appellee:
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (I.B.E.W.) Local 503, Brian Scott, Scott Jensen and others
Defendant:
GenOn Energy Services, LLC
Wang v. The Hearst Corporation
as 16-3302
Plaintiff:
Jessica Ann Best, Paul Vance, Courtney Holt and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Xuedan Wang, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Matthew Jordan Wagster, Erin E. Spencer, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant - Appellee:
The Hearst Corporation
Amicus Curiae:
American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, Communications Workers of America, AFL-CIO, Economic Policy Institute and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
