Labor Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Ferguson v. Ruane Cuniff & Goldfarb Inc.
as 22-275
Plaintiff / Appellee: Michael L. Ferguson, Myrl C. Jeffcoat and Deborah Smith, on behalf of the DST Systems, Inc. 401(K) Profit Sharing Plan
Defendant / Appellee: DST Systems, Inc., The Advisory Committee of the DST Systems, Inc. 401(K) Profit Sharing Plan and The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of DST Systems, Inc.
Defendant: Ruane Cunniff & Goldfarb Inc., George L. Argyros, Tim Bahr and others
Intervenor: James DuCharme, Robert Canfield, Bonnie Kartz and others
Wang v. The Hearst Corporation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-3302
Plaintiff: Jessica Ann Best, Paul Vance, Courtney Holt and others
Plaintiff - Appellant: Xuedan Wang, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Matthew Jordan Wagster, Erin E. Spencer, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant - Appellee: The Hearst Corporation
Amicus Curiae: American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, Communications Workers of America, AFL-CIO, Economic Policy Institute and others
Murphy v. LaJaunie
as 16-3114
Plaintiff - Appellee: Ethan Murphy, Stephanie Castillo, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, Christopher L. Scott, on behalf of themselves and others similiarly situated and others
Defendant: La Boucherie Inc., 15 John Corp., LHLM Group, Corporation, AKA Brasserie Les Halles New York and others
Defendant - Appellant: Philippe LaJaunie
Pruter v. Local 210's Pension Trust Fund We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-733
Plaintiff - Appellant: Janet Pruter, Raymond Marques, John Artates and others
Defendant - Appellee: Local 210's Pension Trust Fund and Local 210, International Brotherhood of Teamsters
Tracy v. NVR, Inc.
as 14-609
Plaintiff: Thomas Gorczyca, Lisa Rybarczyk, Robert Marcello and others
Plaintiff - Appellant: Peter Gavin, K. Maura Mueller and Patrick Tracy, on behalf of himself and all other employees similarly situated
Petitioner: William Mix and James Hutt, IV
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant: Christine Giambrone
Defendant - Appellee: NVR, Inc.
Sutherland v. Ernst & Young LLP
as 13-4868
Plaintiff - Appellant: Stephanie Sutherland, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee: Ernst & Young LLP
Wang v. The Hearst Corporation
as 13-4480
Plaintiff: Jessica Ann Best, Paul Vance, Courtney Holt and others
Plaintiff - Appellant: Xuedan Wang, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Elizabeth Mancini, Matthew Jordan Wagster and others
Defendant - Appellee: The Hearst Corporation
Coniff v. State of Vermont We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-4198
Plaintiff - Appellant: Elizabeth Beaulieu, individually and on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Melissa Belrose-West, individually and on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Jacqueline Bilodeau, individually and on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant - Appellee: State of Vermont, State of Vermont Agency Administration, Neale Lunderville, in his official capacity and others
Nakahata v. New York Presbyterian HealthCa
as 12-4128
Plaintiff: Cynthia Delancy, on behalf of themselves and all other employees similarly situated, Stephanie Bonanno, Thomas Connolly and others
Plaintiff - Appellant: Masahiro Nakahata, on behalf of themselves and all other employees similarly situated and Diana Gardocki, on behalf of themselves and all other employees similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee: New York Presbyterian HealthCare System, Inc., New York and Presbyterian Hospital, Herbert Pardes, M.D. and others
Sutherland v. Ernst & Young LLP We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-304
Plaintiff - Appellee: Stephanie Sutherland, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellant: Ernst & Young LLP

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?