Cases 91 - 100 of 53,432
Oparaji v. Home Retention Corp.
as 24-1444
Plaintiff:
MAURICE OPARAJI
Defendant:
HOME RETENTION CORP., BORCHERT AND LASPINA, PC, ROBERT W. FROMMER and others
People of the State of New York v. City of New York
as 24-1443
Plaintiff:
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, by Letitia James, Attorney General of the State of New York
Defendant:
CITY OF NEW YORK, Police Commissioner DERMOT F. SHEA, Chief of Department TERENCE A. MONAHAN and others
Intervenor:
POLICE BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK, INC. and SERGEANTS BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION
Flynn v. Cable News Network, Inc.
as 24-1448
Plaintiff:
JOHN P. FLYNN, Jack and LESLIE A. FLYNN
Defendant:
CABLE NEWS NETWORK, INC.
Ye v. Garland
as 24-1358
Petitioner:
ZHIMING YE
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Elberus v. Garland
as 24-1442
Petitioner:
JEAN MICHEL ELBERUS, ROSE LAURE ELBERUS ALEXANDRE, LAURIE CHRISTIE ELBERUS and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
United States of America v. Clanton (Mary Clanton)
as 24-1423
Respondent:
JAMILLAH RIVERA and TONY CLANTON
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Appellant:
MARY CLANTON, JEAN MARTELLY, MELVA JAMES and others
McCray v. Walcott
as 24-1394
Petitioner:
JOSEPH MCCRAY
Respondent:
Superintendent WALCOTT, Orleans Correctional Facility
United States of America v. El Kady
as 24-1430
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
AHMED EL KADY
United States of America v. Montalvo (Jonas)
as 24-1437
Defendant:
BRANDON JONAS, MISAEL MONTALVO, CARMEN M. JUSTINIANO RAMIREZ and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Rolon v. City of New York
as 24-1439
Plaintiff:
KAYLA ROLON, COREY GILZEAN, MICHAEL HERNANDEZ and others
Defendant:
CITY OF NEW YORK, NEW YORK POLICE DEPARTMENT, Mayor BILL DE BLASIO and others
Intervenor:
POLICE BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK, INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
