Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Cases 151 - 160 of 53,268
Vasquez v. City of Yonkers
as 24-1220
Plaintiff: GISSELLE VASQUEZ
Defendant: YONKERS PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT, Dr. EDWIN M. QUEZADA, in his personal capacity, in his professional capacity, CITY OF YONKERS and others
DM Manager LLC v. Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.
as 24-1217
Plaintiff: DM MANAGER LLC, MCALLISTER ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION, MOTOR ACCEPTANCE COMPANY, LLC and others
Defendant: FIDELITY NATIONAL INFORMATION SERVICES, INC., FIDELITY INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC and FIS EPROCESS INTELLIGENCE LLC
Rosendale v. Mr. Cooper Group, Inc.
as 24-1216
Defendant: MR. COOPER GROUP, INC., Nationstar Mortgage LLC, CHAMPION MORTGAGE and others
Plaintiff: DONALD P. ROSENDALE
Sarkar v. City of New York
as 24-1219
Plaintiff: JAY SARKAR
Defendant: CITY OF NEW YORK, THE SPECIAL COMMISSIONER OF INVESTIGATION FOR THE NEW YORK CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT, NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION and others
Sava v. Garland
as 24-1192
Petitioner: PAMELA SAVA, SALAJAN SAVA and DAVID SAVA
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Ruderman v. Law Office of Yuriy Prakhin, P.C.
as 24-1186
Plaintiff: YELENA RUDERMAN
Defendant: LAW OFFICE OF YURIY PRAKHIN, P.C. and YURIY PRAKHIN, in both his individual and professional capacities
United States of America v. Murray
as 24-1190
Defendant: WILLIE MURRAY and Sealed Defendant 1
Not Yet Classified: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Ape Group SPA v. Republic of Argentina
as 24-1200
Plaintiff: APE GROUP SPA, ROMANO CONSULTING SPA, ICARO SRL and others
Defendant: REPUBLIC OF ARGENTINA
United States of America v. Poole
as 24-1201
Not Yet Classified: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: ISAAC POOLE
Bannikov v. Garland
as 24-1202
Petitioner: PAVEL BANNIKOV, NIKOLAI BANNIKOV, LIUBOV BANNIKOVA and others
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?