Cases 11 - 20 of 25
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-1942
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Tran v. Bank of New York
as 14-1224
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Anh Nguyet Tran, Christina T. Soulamany, Lai Somchanmavong and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Bank of New York, now known as Bank of New York Mellon by merger and/or acquisition, Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, HSBC Bank USA National Association and others
SRM Global Fund Limited Partne v. Bear Stearns Companies L.L.C.
as 14-507
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SRM Global Master Fund Limited Partnership
Defendant - Appellee:
Bear Stearns Companies L.L.C., FKA Bear Stearns Companies Inc., Alan D. Schwartz, Samuel L. Molinaro, Jr. and others
Bank of America v. Bear Stearns Asset Management
as 13-3847
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Bank of America, National Association and U.S. Bank National Association, solely in its capacity as Trustee under the Indenture
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant - Appellant:
Banc of America Securities LLC
Defendant-Counter-Claimant - Appellee:
Ralph Cioffi, Raymond McGarrigal, Matthew Tannin and others
In Re: Federal Housing Finance
as 13-1122
Petitioner:
UBS Americas Inc., UBS Real Estate Securities Inc., UBS Securities, LLC and others
Respondent:
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation and Federal Housing Finance Agency, as Conservator for the Federal National Mortgage Association and The Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation
In Re: Fannie Mae Securitie
as 12-3859
Plaintiff:
John A. Genovese, Robert M. Rollins, Nicholas Crisafi and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston, Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Stephen B. Ashley, Daniel H. Mudd, Stephen M. Swad and others
In Re: Fannie Mae Securities
as 12-3859
Plaintiff:
John A. Genovese, Robert M. Rollins, Nicholas Crisafi and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston, Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Goldman, Sachs & Co. LLC
Defendant:
Stephen B. Ashley, Daniel H. Mudd, Stephen M. Swad and others
FIC, L.P. v. Bear Stearns Asset Management
as 12-1864
Plaintiff - Appellee:
FIC, L.P., Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
Bear Stearns Asset Management Inc., Ralph Cioffi, Raymond McGarrigal and others
Objector - Appellant:
Edison Fund Limited, Essex Fund Ltd, Feel Good Investment Fund Ltd. and others
In Re: The Bear Stearns Compan
as 11-4177
Plaintiff:
State of Michigan Retirement Systems, Drew V. Lounsbury, Estelle Weber and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Samuel T. Cohen, derivatively and on behalf of Bear Stearns Companies, Inc.
Consolidated-Defendant:
Deloite & Touche LLP and Michael Alix
Defendant:
Jeffrey M. Farber, Michael Minikes, Board of Directors and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Bear Stearns Companies, Inc., Samuel L. Molinaro, Jr., James E. Cayne and others
In Re IndyMac Mortgage-Backed
as 11-3036
Plaintiff:
Police and Fire Retirement of System of the City of Detroit, individually, Police and Fire Retirement System of the City of Detroit, on behalf of all others similarly situated, Wyoming State Treasurer and others
Consolidated-Defendant:
Lynette Antosh, Indymac INDX Mortgage Loan Trust Series 2006-AR14, Indymac INDX Mortgage Loan Trust Series 2006-AR2 and others
Appellant:
City of Philadelphia Board of Pensions and Retirement, AKA "Philadelphia"
Defendant:
Moody's Investor Services, Incorporation, Residential Asset Securitization Trust 2006-A5CB, The McGraw-Hill Companies and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Indymac MBS, Incorporated, Deutsche Bank Securities Inc., John Olinski and others
Intervenor - Appellant:
Los Angeles County Employees Retirement System, AKA "LACERA" and Public Employees' Retirement System of Mississippi, AKA "PERS"
Intervenor:
General Retirement System of the City of Detroit
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
