Cases 11 - 20 of 36
State of New York v. Trump
as 20-2630
Petitioner:
Howard County, American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee, State of Colorado and others
Respondent:
Steven Dillingham, in his official capacity as Director of the United States Census Bureau, Donald J. Trump, United States Department of Commerce and others
United States of America ex re v. Abbvie Inc.
as 19-2947
Plaintiff / Appellant:
State of North Carolina ex rel. John R. Borzilleri, M.D., State of Texas ex rel. John R. Borzilleri, M.D., State of New York ex rel. John R. Borzilleri, M.D. and others
Defendant:
Anthem, Inc., formerly Wellpoint, CVS Caremark, Eli Lilly & Company and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Humana Inc., Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, CVS Health Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
ABC
State of New York v. United States Department of Co
as 19-212
Plaintiff / Appellee:
State of Colorado, State of Illinois, State of New York and others
Defendant:
Ron S. Jarmin, in his capacity as the Director of the U.S. Census Bureau
Defendant / Appellant:
United States Census Bureau, an agency within the United States Department of Commerce, Wilbur L. Ross, in his official capacity as Secretary of Commerce, Steven Dillingham, in his official capacity as Director of the Census and others
State of New York v. Donald Trump
as 18-1988
Plaintiff - Appellee:
State of New York, State of Massachusetts, State of Washington and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, Kirstjen M. Nielsen, Secretary of Homeland Security, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services and others
State of New York v. Donald Trump
as 18-1987
Plaintiff - Appellee:
State of New York, State of Massachusetts, State of Washington and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, Kirstjen M. Nielsen, Secretary of Homeland Security, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services and others
State of New York v. Donald Trump
as 18-1525
Plaintiff - Appellee:
State of New York, State of Massachusetts, State of Washington and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Donald J. Trump, in his official capacity as President of the United States, United States Department of Homeland Security, Kirstjen M. Nielsen, in her official capacity and others
Trump v. State of New York
as 18-1314
Petitioner:
Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, Kirstjen M. Nielsen, Secretary of Homeland Security, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services and others
Respondent:
State of New York, State of Massachusetts, State of Washington and others
State of New York v. Trump
as 18-488
Plaintiff - Appellee:
State of New York, State of Massachusetts, State of Washington and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, Kirstjen M. Nielsen, Secretary of Homeland Security, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services and others
Amicus Curiae:
Citizens United, Citizens United Foundation, Public Advocate of the United States and others
Vidal v. Nielsen
as 18-485
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Martin Jonathan Batall Vidal, Make the Road New York, on behalf of itself, its members, its clients, and all similarly situated individuals, Antonio Alarcon and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Amicus Curiae:
Citizens United, Citizens United Foundation, Public Advocate of the United States and others
In Re: Kirstjen M. Nielsen
as 17-3345
Petitioner:
Kevin McAleenan, Secretary of Homeland Security, Jefferson B. Sessions III, United States Attorney General, Donald J. Trump, President of the United States and others
Respondent:
Martin Jonathan Batall Vidal, Make the Road New York, Antonio Alarcon and others
Amicus Curiae:
City of Los Angeles, California, City of Austin, Texas, City of Boston, Massachusetts and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
