Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Cases 21 - 30 of 867
Smith-Burrus v. Banning Police Department
as 24-152
Plaintiff / Appellant: ALFREDA SMITH-BURRUS
Defendant / Appellee: BANNING POLICE DEPARTMENT, YONKERS POLICE DEPARTMENT and DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Brown v. New York City Police Department
as 24-112
Plaintiff / Appellant: NOEL L. BROWN
Defendant / Appellee: CAPTAIN FIRSOV, CITY OF NEW YORK, NYCD C.O. COVINTON and others
Defendant: NEW YORK CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, FIFTH PRECINCT NEW YORK COUNTY, ANDREW OLIVER and others
Bailey v. New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision
as 24-98
Plaintiff / Appellee: MARY E. BAILEY
Defendant / Appellant: NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND COMMUNITY SUPERVISION
Long v. Annucci
as 24-42
Plaintiff / Appellant: VINCENT S. LONG
Defendant / Appellee: ANTHONY J. ANNUCCI, Commissioner of New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervison, N. DOLDO, Superintendent; Cape Vincent Correctional Facility, M. NITSCHKE and others
Defendant: M. MONTROY, Deputy Superintendent of Programs; Cape Vincent Correctional Facility, L. MOORE, L. SCHABER, Nurse Administrator; Cape Vincent Correctional Facility and others
Allen v. New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision
as 24-30
Plaintiff / Appellee: PETER ALLEN, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, BRIAN BERNARD, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, MARK DANIELS, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated and others
Plaintiff: SPENCER JACKSON, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, MICHAEL VATTIATO, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated and EDDIE FIELDS, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated
Defendant: NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND COMMUNITY SUPERVISION, CARL KOENIGSMANN, MD, JOHN MORLEY, MD and others
Defendant / Appellant: CAROL MOORES, DR.
Petteway v. Connecticut Department of Corrections
as 23-8047
Plaintiff: TAVERAS, Garner CI, CHRISTOPHER DEVEAU, ISAIAH BONEY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: CHRISTOPHER Q. PETTEWAY
Defendant / Appellee: CONNECTICUT DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Which includes, but may not be limited to The Conn State Department Public Health; Securs TECH. Inc; Unity Products, LLC; The United States Post Office Post Master Gomaps, CRAIG WASHINGTON, Warden, Individual and Official Capacity, ANGEL QUIROS, Commissioner of Corrections, Individual and Official Capacity and others
Brown v. James
as 23-7864
Petitioner / Appellant: DARRYL BROWN
Respondent / Appellee: LETITIA JAMES, In her official capacity as Attorney General of New York, ANTHONY J. ANNUCCI, In his official capacity as the acting Commissioner for the New York Department of Corrections and Community Supervision and MICHAEL KIRKPATRICK, In his official capacity as Superintendent of the Clinton Correctional Facility
Wang v. Quiros
as 23-7800
Plaintiff / Appellant: LISHAN WANG
Defendant / Appellee: ANGEL QUIROS, Commissioner, Department of Correction (DOC) State of Connecticut, NED LAMONT, Governer, State of Connecticut (CT), REIS, Warden, Cheshire Correctional Institution (CCI) DOC, CT and others
Jasmin v. Department of Corrections and Community Supervision
as 23-7805
Plaintiff / Appellant: HURGUENS ALLEN JASMIN, II
Defendant / Appellee: DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND COMMUNITY SUPERVISION, Nassau Division, Parole Officer BUSH, Parole Officer SHAW and others
Goode v. Cook
as 23-7521
Plaintiff / Appellant: JASON GOODE
Defendant / Appellee: ROLLIN COOK, Commissioner, Connecticut Department of Correction, in his official and individual capacities, SCOTT SEMPLE, Commissioner, Connecticut Department of Correction, Retired, in his individual capacity, WILLIAM MURPHY, Director, Programs and Treatment Division, Connecticut Department of Correction, in his official and individual capacities and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?