Cases 21 - 27 of 27
In Re IndyMac Mortgage-Backed
as 11-3036
Plaintiff:
Police and Fire Retirement of System of the City of Detroit, individually, Police and Fire Retirement System of the City of Detroit, on behalf of all others similarly situated, Wyoming State Treasurer and others
Consolidated-Defendant:
Lynette Antosh, Indymac INDX Mortgage Loan Trust Series 2006-AR14, Indymac INDX Mortgage Loan Trust Series 2006-AR2 and others
Appellant:
City of Philadelphia Board of Pensions and Retirement, AKA "Philadelphia"
Defendant:
Moody's Investor Services, Incorporation, Residential Asset Securitization Trust 2006-A5CB, The McGraw-Hill Companies and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Indymac MBS, Incorporated, Deutsche Bank Securities Inc., John Olinski and others
Intervenor - Appellant:
Los Angeles County Employees Retirement System, AKA "LACERA" and Public Employees' Retirement System of Mississippi, AKA "PERS"
Intervenor:
General Retirement System of the City of Detroit
In Re IndyMac Mortgage Backed
as 11-2998
Plaintiff:
Police and Fire Retirement of System of the City of Detroit, individually, Police and Fire Retirement System of the City of Detroit, on behalf of all others similarly situated, Wyoming State Treasurer and others
Consolidated-Defendant:
Lynette Antosh, Indymac INDX Mortgage Loan Trust Series 2006-AR14, Indymac INDX Mortgage Loan Trust Series 2006-AR2 and others
Defendant:
Moody's Investor Services, Incorporation, Residential Asset Securitization Trust 2006-A5CB, The McGraw-Hill Companies and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Indymac MBS, Incorporated, Deutsche Bank Securities Inc., John Olinski and others
Intervenor - Appellant:
General Retirement System of the City of Detroit
Teamsters Local 445 Freight Di v. Dynex Capital, Inc.
as 11-1040
Petitioner:
Dynex Capital, Inc. and Merit Securities Corporation
Respondent:
Teamsters Local 445 Freight Division Pension Fund, on its own behalf and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant:
Stephen J. Benedetti, Thomas H. Potts, Lehman Brothers, Inc. and others
Barclays Capital Inc. v. Theflyonthewall.com, Inc.
as 10-1372
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Barclays Capital Incorporated
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant - Appellee:
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Corporated and Morgan Stanley & Company, Incorporated
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant:
Lehman Brothers Inc.
Defendant-Counter-Claimant - Appellant:
Theflyonthewall.com, Incorporated
Barclays Capital Inc. v. Theflyonthewall.com, Inc.
as 10-1372
Appellant:
Theflyonthewall.com, Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Corporated and Lehman Brothers Inc.
Appellee:
Morgan Stanley & Company, Incorporated and Barclays Capital Incorporated
In Re: IndyMac Mortgage-Backed
as 10-898
Plaintiff:
Police and Fire Retirement of System of the City of Detroit, Individually and Police and Fire Retirement System of the City of Detroit, on behalf of all others similarly situated
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Wyoming State Treasurer and Wyoming Retirement System
Consolidated-Defendant:
Lynette Antosh, Indymac INDX Mortgage Loan Trust Series 2006-AR14, Indymac INDX Mortgage Loan Trust Series 2006-AR2 and others
Defendant:
Indymac MBS, Incorporated, Residential Asset Securitization Trust 2006-A5CB, Indymac INDX Mortgage Loan Trust 2006-AR9 and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Moody's Investor Services, Incorporation, The McGraw-Hill Companies and Fitch Incorporation
In Re:Lehman Brothers Mortgage
as 10-712
Plaintiff:
Mortgage Trust 2007-6
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Locals 302 & 612 of the International Union of Operating Engineers - Employers Construction Industry Retirement Trust, New Jersey Carpenters Health Fund, On Behalf of Itself and All Others Similarly Situated and Boilermakers-Blacksmith National Pension Trust
Defendant:
Lehman XS Trust Series 2005-5N, Lehman XS Trust Series 2005-7N, Lehman XS Trust Series 2005-9N and others
Defendant - Appellee:
The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., Moody's Corp., The McGraw Hill Companies, Inc. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
