Cases 21 - 30 of 68
Vazquez Perez v. Decker
as 21-192
Respondent:
United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Robert M. Wilkinson, in his official capacity as Acting Attorney General of the United States, United States Department of Justice and others
Petitioner:
Uriel Vazquez Perez, on his own behalf and on behalf of others similarly situated
Lewis v. Social Security Administration
as 20-4023
Respondent:
Orange County Department of Social Services, Dough Hovey, Chief Executive Officer, Gallagher, Social Secuirty Administrative Judge and others
Petitioner:
Regina Lewis
Bernal Gutierrez v. Decker
as 20-3531
Respondent:
Director Thomas Decker, New York Field Office of U.S. Immigrations and Customs Enforcement, Carl E. Du Bois, Sheriff of Orange County, Chad F. Wolf, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and others
Petitioner:
Juan Edgar Bernal Gutierrez
Mercado v. Town of Goshen
as 20-3402
Defendant / Appellee:
Correctional Officer Ilene Rodriguez, Orange County Correctional Facility's Administration, Captain L. Catletti, Chief Administrative Officer and others
Defendant:
Orange County Jail Chief Administration Officer
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Matthew Louis Mercado
Black v. Decker
as 20-3224
Respondent:
Sheriff Carl E. Dubois, in his official capacity as Sheriff of Orange County, New York, Director Thomas Decker, in his official capacity as Director of New York Field Office of U.S. Immigrations and Customs Enforcement and Chad F. Wolf, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of U.S. Department of Homeland Security
Petitioner:
Carol Williams Black
Velesaca v. Wolf
as 20-2153
Petitioner:
Jose L. Velesaca, on behalf of himself and on behalf of all others similarly situated and Abraham Carlo Uzategui Navarro, on behalf of himself and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Respondent:
Matthew Albence, in his official capacity as the Acting Director for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Thomas R. Decker, in his official capacity as New York Field Office Director for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Gutierrez v. Dubois
as 20-2041
Respondent / Appellee:
Matthew Albence, in his official capacity as the Acting Director for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Francis Russo, Area Director, Bureau of Immigration & Customs Enforcement, JFK Port of Entry, Chad F. Wolf, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of Homeland Security and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
Ramon Gutierrez
Respondent:
Kevin McAleenan, Acting Secretary, Department of Homeland Security and Donald D. Vitiello, District Director, Bureau of Immigration & Customs Enforcement
Boykin v. Orange County New York
as 20-1959
Defendant / Appellee:
Orange County New York, Sgt. Luis Moreno, Department Area Sergeant, in his official and individual capacities and Michael Sgt. Torres
Defendant:
Manual Olavarrio, Orange County, City of Newburg and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jermain Boykin
Boykin v. Orange County New York
as 20-1626
Defendant / Appellee:
Orange County New York, Sgt. Luis Moreno, Department Area Sergeant, in his official and individual capacities and Michael Sgt. Torres
Defendant:
Booking/Intake Sergeant, Orange County, City of Newburg and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jermain Boykin
Rodriguez v. It's Just Lunch International
as 20-1094
Defendant:
IJL Orange County Franchise, Does, 1-136, Loren Schlachet and others
Appellant:
Michael James Barton
Plaintiff:
Andrew Woolf, Karen McBride, individually and for all others similarly situated, Christine Rodriguez, individually and for all others similarly situated and others
Appellee:
Brad Berkowitz
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Lisa Bruno, individually and for all others similarly situated, Janeen Cameron, individually and for all others similarly situated, Karen Malak, individually and for all others similarly situated and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
