Cases 31 - 40 of 81
Sophia v. Decker
as 20-1255
Respondent:
James McHenry, as Director of the Executive Office for Immigration Review, William P. Barr, as Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice, Chad F. Wolf, as Acting Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and others
Petitioner:
Naishel Sophia
Rodriguez Sanchez v. Decker
as 20-695
Respondent:
Chad F. Wolf, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Thomas R. Decker, in his official capacity as New York Field Office Director for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Steven Ahrendt, in his official capacity as Warden and Officer in Charge of the Bergen County Jail and others
Petitioner:
Amado Rodriguez Sanchez
Rivera-Velasquez v. Decker
as 20-615
Respondent:
Chad F. Wolf, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, James McHenry, Thomas Decker, as Field Office Director, New York City Field Office, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Petitioner:
Elmer Rivera-Velasquez
Aguirre v. Barr
as 20-51
Respondent:
Director Carl DuBois, Director of the Orange County Correctional Facility, Director Thomas Decker, New York Field Office Director for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Director James McHenry, Director, Executive Office of Immigration Review and others
Petitioner:
Efrain Fernandez Aguirre
Defendant / Appellant:
Acting Secretary Chad F. Wolf, Acting Secretary of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security
Gomez Dubon v. Decker
as 19-4341
Petitioner:
Omar Esau Gomez Dubon
Respondent:
William P. Barr, in his official capacity as Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice, Thomas Decker, in his official capacity as Field Office Director, New York City Field Office, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Kevin K. McAleenan, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security and others
Thomas v. Decker
as 19-4228
Respondent / Appellee:
Thomas R. Decker, in his official capacity as Field Office Director, New York City Field Office, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, William P. Barr, in his official capacity as Attorney general, U.S. Department of Justice and Chad F. Wolf, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security
Petitioner / Appellant:
Jahema Antonio Thomas
Mamadjonova v. Barr
as 19-3971
Respondent / Appellee:
William P. Barr, in his official capacity as the Attorney General of the United, Todd Lyons, in his official capacity as Massachusetts Acting Field Office Director for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Department of Homeland Security, United States
Petitioner / Appellant:
Bakhodir Sabitovich Madjitov and Madina S. Mamadjonova
Asylum Seeker Advocacy Project v. Barr
as 19-3659
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Immigrant Defenders Law Center, Public Counsel, Central American Resource Center Los Angeles and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Kevin McAleenan, Secretary, Homeland Security, Mark A. Morgan, Acting Director, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Thomas R. Decker, Field Office Director, New York Field Office, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Ottey v. Department of Homeland Securit
as 19-3434
Respondent / Appellee:
Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Petitioner / Appellant:
Dwayne Ottey
Gonzalez-Reyes v. Delmonte
as 19-2543
Respondent:
United States Department of Homeland Security, Elaine Duke, in her official capacity as Acting Secretary of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, William P. Barr, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the United States of America and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
Manuel Nicolas Gonzalez-Reyes
Respondent / Appellee:
Todd Tryon, Assistant Field Office Director, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Buffalo, New York Office, and Director of the Buffalo Federal Detention Facility
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
