Cases 41 - 50 of 325
Apupalo-Chisag v. Garland
as 22-6097
Petitioner:
GABRIEL APUPALO-CHISAG
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Whitehead v. Netflix Inc.
as 22-443
Plaintiff / Appellant:
David Louis Whitehead
Defendant / Appellee:
Netflix Inc., The Travelers Indemnity Company Inc., Gabrielle Bailey, The Travelers Companies and others
Thomas v. Carter
as 22-396
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Caze D. Thomas
Defendant / Appellee:
Shawn Carter, Gabrielle Wilson, Artist known as Young Thug and others
Defendant:
Robert William
Badu v. Garland
as 22-6070
Petitioner:
GABRIEL BADU
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Holt v. Chrysler Capital
as 21-3140
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Billie Lynn Holt
Defendant / Appellee:
Shawn Allgood, Head of Chrysler Captial and Auto Relationships and John Gabriele, President Marina Chrysler Jeep Dodge Mitsubishi
Defendant:
Chrysler Capital and Marina Dodge Chrysler Jeep Ram
United States of America v. Paulino
as 21-2811
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Gabriel Paulino, AKA Tommy Good
United States of America v. Sanchez (Samuels)
as 21-2633
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Roberto Sanchez, Gabrielle Cohen-Sanchez, Wayne Mauricio Burke, AKA Enrique Nunes Arce, AKA Mauricio and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Milton Samuels, AKA Scooby
Whitehead v. Traveler's Insurance Company
as 21-2034
Plaintiff / Appellant:
David Louis Whitehead
Defendant / Appellee:
Traveler's Insurance Company and Gabrielle Bailey
Defendant:
John Does, 1-10
Datta v. DEA Agents
as 21-1960
Petitioner:
Vikram Datta
Respondent:
DEA Agents, IRS Agents, Magistrate Judges and others
In Re: New York City Board of
as 21-1869
Plaintiff:
Elsa Gulino, Mayling Ralph, Peter Wilds and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Gabriel Cintron
Defendant:
New York State Education Department
Defendant / Appellant:
Board of Education of the City School District of the City of New York
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
