Cases 41 - 50 of 4,811
Murphy v. Onondaga County
as 24-904
Plaintiff:
KEVIN MURPHY
Defendant:
ONONDAGA COUNTY, ONONDAGA COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, CARL HUMMEL, all individually and in their capacities as employees of Onondaga County and the Onondaga County Sheriff's Department and others
Encarnacion v. Collado
as 24-911
Defendant:
VITARIUS, C.O.; Shawangunk Correctional Facility, Vitarious, OLIVO, C.O.; Shawangunk Correctional Facility and others
Plaintiff:
BERNABE ENCARNACION
United States of America v. Brown (Battice)
as 24-884
Defendant:
QUINCY BATTICE, DAVON BROWN, CHRISTIAN WILLIAMS and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
The Estate of William Scales v. Amalgamated Transit Union Local 1181-1061, AFL-CIO
as 24-877
Plaintiff:
THE ESTATE OF WILLIAM SCALES
Defendant:
AMALGAMATED TRANSIT UNION LOCAL 1181-1061, AFL-CIO
Cunningham v. Lupis
as 24-844
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. CUNNINGHAM, SR.
Defendant:
FRANCESCO LUPIS, Dr., COLLEEN GALLAGHER, RUDY ALVAREZ and others
Shomo v. State of New York
as 24-818
Plaintiff:
JOSE SHOMO
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW YORK, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND COMMUNITY SUPERVISION, STEWART ECKERT, Superintendent, individually and in official capacity and others
Pager v. Greater Northern Insurance Company
as 24-813
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM PAGER and JENNA PAGER
Defendant:
GREATER NORTHERN INSURANCE COMPANY and CHUBB GROUP OF INSURANCE COMPANIES
Allen v. New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision
as 24-785
Plaintiff:
PETER ALLEN, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, BRIAN BERNARD, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, MARK DANIELS, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated and others
Defendant:
Dr. CAROL MOORES, NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND COMMUNITY SUPERVISION, CHUN LEE, MD and others
United States of America v. Ruegg (Williams)
as 24-786
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
MICHAEL WILLIAMS and RONALD RUEGG
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
