Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Komatsu v. Urban Pathways, Inc.
as 23-654
Petitioner:
Towaki Komatsu
Respondent:
Urban Pathways, Inc., being sued in their individual and official capacities, Daniels Norelli Cecere & Travel PC, being sued in their individual and official capacities, Neighborhood Association for Inter-Cultural Affairs, Inc., being sued in their individual and official capacities and others
United States of America v. Moore
as 22-2805
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Stacy Calhoun, AKA Hauss
Defendant / Appellant:
Lamar Moore, AKA Kane
Komatsu v. The City of New York et al
as 22-2025
Petitioner:
Towaki Komatsu
Respondent:
The City of New York, Nicola Aaronson, Kayla Arslanian and others
Komatsu v. The City of New York
as 22-501
Petitioner:
Towaki Komatsu
Respondent:
The City of New York, Nicola Aaronson, Kayla Arslanian and others
Calhoun v. Borona
as 20-4239
Defendant / Appellant:
Dennis Martinez, Official and Individual Capacity, Joseph Morales, Sgt., Official and Individual Capacity, John Doe, K9 Officer, Official and Individual Capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Shannon L. Calhoun
United States of America v. Moore
as 20-2972
Defendant:
Stacy Calhoun, AKA Hauss
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Lamar Moore, AKA Kane
United States of America v. Simms-Calhoun (Woods)
as 20-2247
Defendant:
Quamain Simms-Calhoun
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Dajon Woods
United States of America v. Moore
as 19-723
Defendant:
Stacy Calhoun, AKA Hauss
Undetermined:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Lamar Moore, AKA Kane
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 18-1151
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
United States of America v. Calhoun (USA)
as 17-1161
Plaintiff - Appellant:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellee:
Shannon Calhoun
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
