Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,390
United States of America v. Pennick
as 24-1606
Not Yet Classified: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: TYRONE PENNICK and GENEVA SMITH
Dees v. Zurlo
as 24-1574
Plaintiff: JENNIFER LYNN DEES and ETHAN DAVIS SMITH
Defendant: JILLIAN KNOX, SAMUAL MAXWELL, EMILY WILLIAMS and others
Parker v. Smith
as 24-1561
Petitioner: VERNON E. PARKER, JR.
Respondent: JOSEPH T. SMITH
Oparaji v. Home Retention Corp.
as 24-1444
Plaintiff: MAURICE OPARAJI
Defendant: HOME RETENTION CORP., BORCHERT AND LASPINA, PC, ROBERT W. FROMMER and others
United States of America v. Williams (Davis)
as 24-1425
Defendant: RONALD GLEN DAVIS, TERRENCE WILLIAMS, ALAN ANDERSON and others
Not Yet Classified: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Smith
as 24-1384
Defendant: CHRISTOPHER SMITH and Sealed Defendant 1
Not Yet Classified: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Williams (Bynum)
as 24-1337
Defendant: WILLIAM BYNUM, ALAN ANDERSON, TERRENCE WILLIAMS and others
Not Yet Classified: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Williams (Bynum)
as 24-1253
Defendant: WILLIAM BYNUM, ALAN ANDERSON, TERRENCE WILLIAMS and others
Not Yet Classified: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Smith v. Goodman
as 24-1255
Petitioner: JUA SMITH
Respondent: DENISHA GOODMAN
Buczek v. Seterus, LLC
as 24-1143
Plaintiff: DEBORAH A. BUCZEK
Defendant: SETERUS, LLC, sometimes also assuming the alias of PHH Mortgage, JOHN DOES, said names being fictitious parties intended being possible corporations and/or individuals known or yet to be known involved in any way with this case as Defendants, JANE DOES, said names being fictitious parties intended being possible corporations and/or individuals known or yet to be known involved in any way with this case as Defendants and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?