Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Ifeji v. Garland
as 24-484
Defendant:
BRETT EISELE, central pinal justice court precinct 3 judge et al., Central Pinal Justice Court Precinct 3 HEIRS AND ASSIGNS, MARIAN BROWN, dallas county sherrif et al., DALLAS COUNTY SHERRIFS OFFICE HEIRS AND ASSIGNS, GLENN HEGAR, texas secretary of state et al., TEXAS COMPTROLLERS OFFICE HEIRS AND ASSIGNS and others
Plaintiff:
JAZZLYN SHABERA IFEJI, a Mooress beneficiary EMPRESS JAZLIN TRUST A Empress, Admiral, Mariner A, Merchant, Piloter Nations a private Moor aboriginal texan national territory of Spain, JAZZLYN SHABERA IFEJI ESTATE ET. AL., beneficiary, JOSEPH EDDIE PRYOR ESTATE ET AL., beneficiary JOSEPH EDDIE PRYOR et al. and others
Barclay v. Dixon
as 24-92
Defendant / Appellee:
MAKAYLA COOK, Police Officer, Sandusky Police Department, Heirs and Assigns D/B/A Makayla Cook, TIM MCCONAHAY, Warden, Mansfield Correctional Facility, Heirs and Assigns D/B/A Tim Mcconahay, ROBERT A. DIXON, Attorney, Attorney at Law, Heirs and Assigns D/B/A Robert A. Dixon and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LESHAWN MAURICE BARCLAY, a Moor beneficiary, a Emperor, Admiral, Mariner, Merchant, Piloter a private Moor aboriginal ohioan national, and subject of the Al Maroc Shereefian Empire
United States of America v. Hartley (Sanders)
as 20-2130
Defendant:
Maurice Hartley, AKA Bugz, Tyvann Barnett, AKA Ty, Marie Palumbo and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Reginald Sanders, AKA Black
Appellee:
United States of America
Coon v. Bell
as 19-2992
Defendant / Appellee:
George Bell, individually, and in his official capacity as Chief of both police departments, Cambridge and Greenwich, NY, Karen Bell, Sheriff Jeffrey J. Murphy and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Donald J. Coon
United States of America v. Brigg
as 12-2988
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Eric Williams, Damian Ard, Rodney McGilverly, AKA Patches, AKA Cliff and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Antonio Briggs, AKA Gumps
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
