Cases 1 - 10 of 1,170
Yerdon v. Poitras
as 24-1263
Plaintiff:
EDWARD A. YERDON
Defendant:
NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLE, ELIZABETH ROMAND and KARIN POITRAS
Turner III v. John Doe
as 24-1242
Plaintiff:
JAMES R. TURNER, III
Defendant:
EDWARD RAPP and JOHN DOE
Johnson v. Chappius
as 24-1225
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER JOHNSON
Defendant:
Superintendent PAUL CHAPPIUS, Jr., GREGORY KELLER, Deputy Superintendent For Security, Lieutenant TIMOTHY CARROLL and others
United States of America v. Green (Johnson)
as 24-1017
Defendant:
DARRYL JOHNSON, NORMAN WORKMAN, CLAYTON GREEN and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Gibson v. Caban
as 24-1005
Plaintiff:
BENNIE GIBSON
Defendant:
HONORABLE JUDGES PRESIDING IN LITIGATION, EDWARD A. CABAN, The City Commissioner NYPD & Deputy Commissioner, KINGS COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY OFFICE SUPERVISORS AND PROSECUTORS PROSECUTING INDICTMENT and others
Knight v. City of New York
as 24-982
Plaintiff:
CAVALIER D. KNIGHT
Defendant:
CITY OF NEW YORK and EDWARD A. CABAN
Youte v. Greater Bridgeport Transit Authority
as 24-953
Plaintiff:
GUY YOUTE
Defendant:
GREATER BRIDGEPORT TRANSIT AUTHORITY, EDWARD O'KEEFE, THOMAS GORMAN and others
Murphy v. Onondaga County
as 24-900
Plaintiff:
KEVIN MURPHY
Defendant:
ONONDAGA COUNTY, ONONDAGA COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, CARL HUMMEL, all individually and in their capacities as employees of Onondaga County and the Onondaga County Sheriff's Department and others
Murphy v. Onondaga County
as 24-904
Plaintiff:
KEVIN MURPHY
Defendant:
ONONDAGA COUNTY, ONONDAGA COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, CARL HUMMEL, all individually and in their capacities as employees of Onondaga County and the Onondaga County Sheriff's Department and others
Banks v. McGlynn, Hays & Co., Inc.
as 24-895
Plaintiff:
EDWARD BANKS
Defendant:
MCGLYNN, HAYS & CO., INC., GERARD CARLUCCI, Individually, JOSEPH I. CRINCOLI, Individually and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
