Cases 1 - 4 of 4
Ifeji v. Garland
as 24-484
Defendant:
BRETT EISELE, central pinal justice court precinct 3 judge et al., Central Pinal Justice Court Precinct 3 HEIRS AND ASSIGNS, MARIAN BROWN, dallas county sherrif et al., DALLAS COUNTY SHERRIFS OFFICE HEIRS AND ASSIGNS, GLENN HEGAR, texas secretary of state et al., TEXAS COMPTROLLERS OFFICE HEIRS AND ASSIGNS and others
Plaintiff:
JAZZLYN SHABERA IFEJI, a Mooress beneficiary EMPRESS JAZLIN TRUST A Empress, Admiral, Mariner A, Merchant, Piloter Nations a private Moor aboriginal texan national territory of Spain, JAZZLYN SHABERA IFEJI ESTATE ET. AL., beneficiary, JOSEPH EDDIE PRYOR ESTATE ET AL., beneficiary JOSEPH EDDIE PRYOR et al. and others
Coulter v. Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorpora
as 13-2504
Plaintiff - Appellant:
G. Kenneth Coulter, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, John Siefken, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Gregory Major, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated, Morgan Stanley, The Investment Committee of The Morgan Stanley 401(k) plan and others
In re Morgan Stanley ERISA Lit
as 13-2509
Plaintiff:
Elena Ramos and Alvin Saini
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Carolyn Egan, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, C. Kenneth Coulter, John Siefken and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Morgan Stanely & Co. Incorporated, Morgan Stanley, The Investment Committee of the Morgan Stanley 401k Plan, FKA The Morgan Stanley DPSP/Start Plan and others
Stratte-McClure v. Lynch
as 13-627
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Joel Stratte-McClure and Fjarde AP-Fonden
Movant - Appellant:
Plaintiff StateBoston Retirement System, State-Boston Retirement System
Defendant - Appellee:
Morgan Stanley, a Delaware Corporation, John J. Mack, Zoe Cruz and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
