Cases 1 - 10 of 664
Lettieri v. Department of Justice
as 24-1500
Plaintiff:
DAVID C. LETTIERI
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
Lettieri v. Department of Justice
as 24-1489
Plaintiff:
DAVID C. LETTIERI
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and MAEVE E. HUGGINS
Lettieri v. Department of Justice
as 24-1375
Plaintiff:
DAVID C. LETTIERI
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
Lettieri v. Department of Justice
as 24-1357
Plaintiff:
DAVID C. LETTIERI
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Lettieri v. Department of Justice
as 24-1304
Plaintiff:
DAVID C. LETTIERI
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Jean-Baptiste v. United States Department of Justice
as 24-1299
Plaintiff:
HAROLD JEAN-BAPTISTE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
Encarnacion v. Irby
as 24-1133
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL ENCARNACION
Defendant:
MICHELLE FOGGIE, clerk of the bronx supreme court criminal division, JOHN SAMPUGNARO, Motions Clerk of the Bronx Supreme Court Criminal Div., SANDRA IRBY, assistant deputy counsel for the new york state office of court administration and others
Lewis v. United States Department of Health and Human Services
as 24-1140
Plaintiff:
RACQUEL LEWIS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Kelsey v. Kessel
as 24-1105
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL N. KELSEY
Defendant:
BRITTNEY KESSEL, individually and in his official capacity as Dutchess County Attorney and JOHN GARRITO, Individually and in his Official Capacity as Town Justice District of the Town of Beekman
Lettieri v. Department of Justice
as 24-1072
Plaintiff:
DAVID C. LETTIERI
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
