Cases 1 - 10 of 2,458
United States of America v. Boyd (Jermaine Buchanan)
as 24-2139
Defendant:
DAVID 17 BURDEN, FRANK KNIGHT, JOSEPH DANIELS and others
:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. James (Reena L. James)
as 24-2065
Defendant:
MATHEW JAMES
:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Appellant:
REENA L. JAMES
J.M. v. Sessions
as 24-1997
Defendant:
DOES 1-6, ASHLEY SESSIONS, JOSHUA A. BUELL and others
Plaintiff:
J. M., as Administrator of the Estate of Her Son, C.B.
Cullum v. Wyndham Hotels & Resorts Corporation
as 24-1949
Defendant:
GEOFFREY A. BALLOTTI, WYNDHAM HOTELS (WH) & RESORTS, INC., BROADRIDGE CORPORATE ISSUER SOLUTIONS and others
Plaintiff:
DEIRDRE SALEH and SANDRA L. CULLUM
Platsky v. New York Police Department
as 24-1925
Defendant:
NEW YORK POLICE DEPARTMENT, KARIMA ETORIA, Lt. Officer JERMAINE ODEN and others
Plaintiff:
HENRY PLATSKY
Interested Party:
CITY OF NEW YORK
Saunders v. Cardali
as 24-1909
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CITY WIDE ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES, PARIS L. JASON, DONTE MILLS and others
Plaintiff:
MARVIN SAUNDERS
Williams v. Lorman
as 24-1866
Defendant:
JOSEPH LORMAN, Magistrate, WENDY DICKIE, Court Operation Manager, VICTORIA THOPE, Case Manager and others
Plaintiff:
SEAN L. WILLIAMS
Toliver v. Jones
as 24-1857
Defendant:
G. SAJ, Deputy of Security, ELLIESS, Personnel, G. JONES, Superintendent and others
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL RASHEEN RAYMOND TOLIVER
Stevenson v. Thornburgh
as 24-1788
Plaintiff:
GREGORY A. STEVENSON, as a Shareholder of CREDIT SUISSE GROUP AG and on behalf of CREDIT SUISSE GROUP AG shareholders
Defendant:
RICHARD E. THORNBURGH, BRADLEY W. DOUGAN, JOHN G. POPP and others
Lawtone-Bowles v. Thornburgh
as 24-1794
Plaintiff:
NICOLE LAWTONE-BOWLES, as a shareholder of CREDIT SUISSE GROUP AG and on behalf of CREDIT SUISSE GROUP AG shareholders
Defendant:
RICHARD E. THORNBURGH, BRADLEY W. DOUGAN, JOHN G. POPP and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
