Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Guamani Endara v. Garland
as 23-7786
Petitioner:
ALEX MARCELO GUAMANI ENDARA, JESSICA SALOME LOGRONO ARMAS and MERCY CATRINA GUAMANI LOGRONO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Vivar-Munoz v. Garland
as 22-6575
Petitioner:
HENRY MARCELO VIVAR-MUNOZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Johnson v. Tunecore
as 22-2006
Petitioner:
Robert W. Johnson
Respondent:
Tunecore, iTunes, Apple Music and others
Escamilla Vidals v. Garland
as 21-6316
Petitioner:
MARCELO ESCAMILLA VIDALS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Guiracocha Leon v. Garland
as 21-6201
Petitioner:
MANUEL MARCELO GUIRACOCHA LEON
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Rigueiro v. The Republic of Argentina
as 20-3094
Plaintiff:
Paula De Nicola, Marta Beatriz Gatti, Enrique Jorge Rocca and others
Defendant / Appellee:
The Republic of Argentina
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Denise Marie Laurette Dussault In Collella and Michelle Colella
Colella v. The Republic of Argentina
as 20-3031
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michelle Colella and Denise Dussault
Defendant / Appellee:
The Republic of Argentina
Plaintiff:
Paula De Nicola, Marta Beatriz Gatti, Enrique Jorge Rocca and others
Century Surety Company v. Rukh Enterprises, Inc.
as 20-1474
Defendant:
Marcelo DeJesus and Rukh Enterprises, Inc.
Defendant / Appellant:
Long Island Railroad, Metropolitan Transit Authority and Admiral Insurance Company
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Century Surety Company
Moore v. City of New York
as 20-1202
Defendant / Appellee:
Det. Erick M. Parks, Det. Elena Gonzalez-Munoz, Det. Marcelo Luc and others
Defendant:
John and Jane Doe 1 through 10, individually and in their official capacities (the names John and Jane Doe being fictitious, as the true names are presently unknown)
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Christopher Moore
Cepeda Perez v. Barr
as 20-292
Petitioner:
Marcelo Carlos Cepeda Perez
Respondent:
William P. Barr, United States Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
