Cases 1 - 10 of 161
Grant v. Adult Protective Service
as 24-1435
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH GRANT, GRACE GRANT, ADULT PROTECTIVE SERVICES and others
Defendant:
Police Officer NATALIE BALLATO, Shield #13280, Police Officer JOSEPH DELLIGATTI, Shield #13106, Lt. WILLIAM FIELDS and others
Ham-Pena v. Garland
as 24-1287
Petitioner:
CARLOS ALBERTO HAM-PENA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Torres v. City of New York
as 24-574
Petitioner:
WILFREDO TORRES
Respondent:
CITY OF NEW YORK, Police Lieutenant NEIL VERAS, (Shield #unknown) New York City Police Dept., Police Officer PATRICIA DE JESUS, (Shield #1305) New York City Police Dept. and others
Torres v. City of New York
as 24-247
Petitioner:
WILFREDO TORRES
Respondent:
CITY OF NEW YORK, CYRUS R. VANCE, JR., THE LEGAL AID SOCIETY and others
Torres v. City of New York
as 24-131
Petitioner:
WILFREDO TORRES
Respondent:
CITY OF NEW YORK, CYRUS R. VANCE, JR., District Attorney, THE LEGAL AID SOCIETY and others
Moza-Pena v. Garland
as 24-61
Petitioner:
ERICK ANIBAL MOZA-PENA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Pena Garcia v. United States Department of Labor
as 23-8066
Petitioner:
LUIS PENA GARCIA
Respondent:
Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, IMS INSURANCE COMPANY OF PUERTO RICO and CALZADILLA CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION
Pena v. United States of America
as 23-7758
Petitioner:
JOSE PENA
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Sierra (Cruz)
as 23-7642
Defendant:
LEONIDES SIERRA, RICHARD GONZALEZ, CARLOS URENA and others
Defendant / Appellant:
JOSE CRUZ, Sealed Defendant 3, Prostituto and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Torres v. City of New York
as 23-1287
Petitioner:
Wilfredo Torres
Respondent:
City of New York, District Attorney Cyrus Vance, The Legal Aid Society and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
