Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Brozik v. Renewable Energy Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01854
Plaintiff:
Dawn Brozik
Defendant:
Renewable Energy Group, Inc., Randolph L. Howard, Cynthia Warner and others
Whitfield v. Renewable Energy Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01787
Plaintiff:
Matthew Whitfield
Defendant:
Renewable Energy Group, Inc., Jeffrey Stroburg, Randolph L. Howard and others
China Power Equipment, Inc. et al v. Song et al
as 1:2016cv02914
Plaintiff:
An Sen (Xi'An) Power Science & Technology Co., Ltd., China Power Equipment, Inc. and Concorde Equity II, LLC
Defendant:
Dangsheng Chen, Nicole Chen, Child, Van Wagoner & Bradshaw, PPLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv02806
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01120
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Aziz v. Mirchoff et al
as 1:2016cv00951
Plaintiff:
Mohammad Abdul Aziz
Defendant:
Wendy Christensen, Bret Mirchoff, Brian Skoog and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv07114
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv06368
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Carson Optical, Inc. v. CRS Global, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv05949
Defendant:
CRS Global, Inc. and Jack I. Christensen
Plaintiff:
Carson Optical, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv05146
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
