Cases 31 - 40 of 43
Wang et al v. Herald Towers, LLC et al
as 1:2010cv05232
Plaintiff:
Chazz-Lee Wang and Hsing-Lee Wang
Defendant:
Herald Towers, LLC and The Gap, Inc.
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
The Gap, Inc.
Thirdparty_defendant:
Thyssenkrupp Elevator Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Gemma Redux Inc. v. Banana Republic LLC et al
as 1:2010cv03568
Plaintiff:
Gemma Redux Inc.
Defendant:
Banana Republic LLC , Gap Inc. and Does 1 through 10
Counter_defendant:
Rachel Dooley and Gemma Redux Inc.
Counter_claimant:
Banana Republic LLC and Gap Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
G.A.P. Adventures, Inc. v. The Gap, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv01133
Plaintiff:
G.A.P. Adventures, Inc.
Defendant:
The Gap, Inc. , Gap (Apparel) LLC , Banana Republic, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv09018
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Glory Licensing LLC v. Gap, Inc.
as 1:2009cv07613
Plaintiff:
Glory Licensing LLC
Defendant:
Gap, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv09292
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
La Petite Princesse, Inc v. MJM Jewelry Corp. et al
as 1:2008cv08006
Plaintiff:
La Petite Princesse, Inc
Defendant:
MJM Jewelry Corp., Martha Berry and Gap, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv07163
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Cook v. The Gap, Inc.
as 1:2008cv04914
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Cook
Defendant:
The Gap, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
The Gap, Inc. et al v. G.A.P. Adventures Inc.
as 1:2007cv09614
Plaintiff:
The Gap, Inc. and Gap (Apparel) LLC
Defendant:
G.A.P. Adventures Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 la
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
