Cases 1 - 10 of 323
Duffy v. Lynch et al
as 1:2024cv06945
Defendant:
Shawn M. Guertin, C. David Brown II, Michael F. Mahoney and others
Plaintiff:
Sonia Duffy
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 j(b)ss Stockholder Suit
Silva v. Lynch et al
as 1:2024cv06892
Plaintiff:
Nathan Silva
Defendant:
C. David Brown, J. Scott Kirby, CVS Health Corportation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 j(b)ss Stockholder Suit
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv06894
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv06895
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Richard v. Combs et al
as 1:2024cv06848
Defendant:
Remote Productions Inc., The Nordlinger Group, LLC, Bad Boy Entertainment Holdings Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Dawn Angelique Richard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Kaufmann v. Lynch et al
as 1:2024cv06595
Defendant:
Anne M. Finucane, Thomas F. Cowhey, Michael F. Mahoney and others
Plaintiff:
Chaya Sara Kaufmann
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Pierre v. John Doe et al
as 1:2024cv06127
Defendant:
John Doe and Brinks Inc.
Plaintiff:
Katheline Pierre
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Pierre v. Ramapo Manor Nursing Center, Inc.
as 7:2024cv05778
Plaintiff:
Lowly Pierre
Defendant:
Ramapo Manor Nursing Center, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216 (b) FLSA: Minimum wage or overtime compensation
Pierre v. John Doe et al
as 1:2024cv05974
Defendant:
John Doe and Brinks Inc.
Plaintiff:
Katheline Pierre
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pi Diversity-Personal Injury
Shabazz v. Grainge et al
as 1:2024cv05806
Defendant:
Kevin Couch K, Pierre Thomas, UMG and others
Plaintiff:
Danny Amen Valentine Shabazz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
