Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Pearson, Jr. v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2022cv01000
Plaintiff:
Kevin M. Pearson, Jr.
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Pearson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2020cv06630
Plaintiff:
Justin M. Pearson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Pearson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2020cv06312
Plaintiff:
Christine Marie Pearson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Wynder v. Pearson et al
as 6:2019cv06598
Defendant:
M.D. Gyorgy Tokar, Ann Marie T. Sullivan, M.D. Laurence Guttmacher and others
Plaintiff:
Vincent Wynder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pearson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2019cv06184
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Deborah J Pearson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
LaVallee v. Wimberly et al
as 6:2019cv06029
Defendant:
Antonio Wimberly, AKA Investment Group Inc and Shantae Pearson
Plaintiff:
Christopher LaVallee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pisercia v. Annucci et al
as 6:2018cv06207
Plaintiff:
Joseph Pisercia
Defendant:
Anthony Annucci, James Zakrzewski, Adam Blaner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McGraw-Hill Global Education Holdings, LLC et al
as 6:2017cv06574
Plaintiff:
McGraw-Hill Global Education Holdings, LLC , Pearson Education, Inc. and Cengage Learning, Inc.
Defendant:
Zichao Wang
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Carlton v. Pearson
as 1:2016cv00680
Plaintiff:
Corydon Carlton
Defendant:
Pearson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: M&T Bank Corporation ERISA Litigation
as 1:2016cv00375
Defendant:
M&T Bank Corporation, Edward Amoroso, Richard G. King and others
Plaintiff:
Habib, Sa'ud Habib, Beverly Williams and others
Consolidated Defendant:
Michael P. Pinto
In Re:
In re M&T Bank Corporation ERISA Litigation
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Allen
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
