Cases 51 - 60 of 840,518
ADAMS v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
as 2:2024cv04953
Plaintiff:
KENNA ADAMS
Defendant:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
RAMOS v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2024cv04954
Plaintiff:
CHERYL AIGNER RAMOS
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK A/S and NOVO NORDISK INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BIGTREE v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2024cv04955
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK A/S and NOVO NORDISK INC.
Plaintiff:
JOLEEN BIGTREE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CARABAJAL v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
as 2:2024cv04956
Defendant:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
Plaintiff:
GRACIELA CARABAJAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
DENNEY v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2024cv04957
Plaintiff:
JESSE CLAYTON DENNEY
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK INC. and NOVO NORDISK A/S
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
FELTON v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2024cv04958
Plaintiff:
STEPHANIE FELTON
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK INC. and NOVO NORDISK A/S
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
RUEGSEGGER v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2024cv04959
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY RUEGSEGGER
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK INC. and NOVO NORDISK A/S
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SKEENS v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2024cv04960
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK INC. and NOVO NORDISK A/S
Plaintiff:
BARRY SKEENS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
WADE v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2024cv04961
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK INC. and NOVO NORDISK A/S
Plaintiff:
EMILY WADE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
WALKER v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2024cv04962
Plaintiff:
HADRIAN WALKER
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK INC., NOVO NORDISK A/S and ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
