Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Allen et al v. Citimortgage Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv04542
Plaintiff:
Deloris Allen and Oswald Allen
Defendant:
CFO Citimortgage, Citimortgage Inc. and Jane Fraser
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Tope v. Equity Now, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv02076
Plaintiff:
Achyut Tope
Defendant:
Equity Now, Inc. , US Bank , Citigroup Global Markets Realty Corp and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Tope v. Equity Now, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv02067
Plaintiff:
Achyut Tope
Defendant:
Equity Now, Inc. , US Bank , Citigroup Global Markets Realty Corp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Tanasi et al v. CitiMortgage, Inc et al
as 3:2016cv00727
Defendant:
CitiMortgage, Inc and M&T Bank
Plaintiff:
Richard Tanasi and Athansula Tanasi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Johnson 'El v. CitiMortgage, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv01024
Defendant:
CitiMortgage, Inc., Does 1 through 100, Inclusive and Mortgage Electonic Registration System, Inc.
Plaintiff:
O. Valentine Johnson 'El
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Harper v. CitiMortgage Inc.
as 1:2013cv00496
Plaintiff:
Forrest Harper
Defendant:
CitiMortgage Inc.
Cause Of Action: Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act
Beck et al v. Citimortgage, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv04562
Plaintiff:
Allan Beck and Sheri L. Beck
Defendant:
Citimortgage, Inc., Fannie Mae, First Portland Mortgage Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Saunders et al v. Principal Residential Mortgage, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv01817
Plaintiff:
Sherri L. Saunders and Shelli L. McDougal
Defendant:
Principal Residential Mortgage, Inc., Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. , CitiMortgage, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Lewis v. Citimortgage, Inc.
as 1:2011cv00515
Defendant:
Citimortgage, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Julie Lewis
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
