Cases 21 - 30 of 73
Bell v. United States Post Office et al
as 1:2021cv05052
Plaintiff:
Constance Bell
Defendant:
George D. Perez and The United States Post Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Moore v. United States Postal Service et al
as 1:2021cv04971
Plaintiff:
Linda Moore
Defendant:
United States Postal Service, George Daniel Perez and Constance Adell Bell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1364 Auto Negligence
Cruz et al v. Santana-DeLaRosa et al
as 2:2021cv03656
Defendant:
Carlos M. Santana-DeLaRosa, Alino A. Mercado Perez, Yesmy Molina and others
Plaintiff:
Nelson A. Cruz and Diana Cruz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Perez v. Green et al
as 7:2020cv09289
Plaintiff:
Roque Perez
Defendant:
Guillermo J. Soraire, Edwardo Justiniano, Lester Green and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 tm
Bashir v. Caravan Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv05217
Defendant:
Rivelino Arias-Perez and Caravan Inc.
Plaintiff:
Muhammad M. Bashir
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Conradie v. Paredes-Perez
as 2:2020cv04431
Plaintiff:
Ian Conradie
Defendant:
Hector Paredes-Perez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Perez v. Gee Vee Trucking, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00691
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
JOHAN A. BONILLA-GOMEZ
Plaintiff:
Edwin H Perez
Defendant:
Gee Vee Trucking
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Perez v. Smith, et al
as 1:2019cv04233
Plaintiff:
Walter Perez
Defendant:
Paul Smith and Barclay Water Management, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Perez v. Smith
as 1:2019cv04231
Defendant:
Walter Smith
Plaintiff:
Walter Perez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Perez v. Smith et al
as 1:2019cv02085
Plaintiff:
Barclay Water Management, Inc., Walter Perez and Paul Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Auto Negligence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
