Cases 41 - 50 of 138
Hazelet v. Stallings et al
as 1:2020cv01063
Defendant:
Midwest Transport, Inc. a/k/a Midwest Transport of Illinois, Kenneth L. Stallings, Midwest Transport, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Scott Hazelet
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Berner v. Croop
as 1:2020cv00278
Plaintiff:
Susan K Berner
Defendant:
David H Croop
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Apau v. Douglass et al
as 1:2020cv01743
Respondent:
John H. Douglass and United Natural Foods, Inc.
Petitioner:
Jonas K Apau
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 pr
Mansour v. Plentie et al
as 1:2019cv06979
Defendant:
John K Kieshir and Kareem Plentie
Plaintiff:
Basel Mansour
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (
Scarantino v. Branche Mora et al
as 1:2019cv10117
Defendant:
WINSTON O. BRANCHE MORA, HEDR DEALER and PRO-TEK OF NEW YORK, INC.
Plaintiff:
BRIAN K. SCARANTINO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pi
Schultz et al v. Bhatti
as 1:2019cv01457
Plaintiff:
Carl Schultz and Courtney Schultz
Defendant:
Surjit K. Bhatti
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Keathley et al v. Annor et al
as 1:2019cv09516
Defendant:
Mark P Ringo, Kennedy Annor, Samuel H Kim and others
Plaintiff:
Graig Keathley, Molly Keathley, Craig Keathley and others
Petitioner:
Ke Me
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pi
Lopez et al v. Kandhari et al
as 1:2019cv04899
Plaintiff:
Yor Yunio Lopez and Jorge Rincon
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc., Amit K. Singh, Jagyoti S. Kandhari and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lopez et. al. v. Kandhari et. al.
as 2:2019cv04899
Plaintiff:
Yor Yunio Lopez and Jorge Rincon
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc., Amit K. Singh, Jagyoti S. Kandhari and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Barrett v. Rosario et al
as 1:2019cv07815
Defendant:
Aspen Landscaping Contracting, Inc., Ruben Rosario and Ruben R. Rosario
Plaintiff:
Chandra K. Barrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 nr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
