Cases 31 - 37 of 37
In Touch Concepts, Inc. v. Verizon Communications Inc.
as 12-383
Plaintiff - Appellant:
In Touch Concepts, Inc., on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, DBA ZCOM
Defendant - Appellee:
Verizon Communications Inc., Cellco Partnership, DBA Verizon Wireless, Vodafone Group Plc and others
In Touch Concepts, Inc. v. Verizon Communications Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00025
Plaintiff:
In Touch Concepts, Inc.
Defendant:
Verizon Communications Inc. , Cellco Partnership , Vodafone Group Plc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Travelers Indemnity Company v. Valley Psychological, P.C. et al
as 1:2011cv02834
Defendant:
Andrew Blumenthal, Bushwick Plaza Medical, P.C., Lennox Anthony Calder and others
Plaintiff:
Travelers Indemnity Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Clark v. Northtown Automotive Companies, Inc.
as 1:2009cv00695
Plaintiff:
William D. Clark
Defendant:
Northtown Automotive Companies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Fischer v. Clark
as 2:2008cv03807
Plaintiff:
Gregory John Fischer
Defendant:
Ashley Anne Clark
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Varga et al v. Bear Stearns Asset Management Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv03397
Plaintiff:
Geoffrey Varga, William Cleghorn, Stillwater Capital Partners L.P. and others
Defendant:
Bear Stearns Asset Management Inc., The Bear Stearns Companies, Inc., Bear Stearns & Co. Inc. and others
Nominal Defendant:
Bear Stearns High-Grade Structured Credit Strategies Fund, L.P. and Bear Stearns High-Grade Structured Credit Strategies Enhanced Leverage Fund, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 bc Diversity-Breach of Contract
Zucker et al v. Big Lake Services Company LLC et al
as 1:2007cv07815
Plaintiff:
Daniel Zucker, Zalman Anderson, YS Trust and others
Defendant:
Big Lake Services Company LLC and Big Lake Management LLC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
