Cases 1 - 10 of 193
D'Onofrio General Contractors Corp. v. Sika AG et al
as 1:2024cv03255
Plaintiff:
D'Onofrio General Contractors Corp
Defendant:
Sika AG, Sika Corporation, Chryso, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337 sc Sherman-Clayton Act
Novak v. Continental Aktiengesellschaft et al
as 1:2024cv01202
Plaintiff:
Frank Novak
Defendant:
Continental Aktiengesellschaft, Continental Tire the Americas, LLC, Compagnie Generale des Etablissements and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
World Association of Icehockey Players Unions North America Division et al v. National Hockey League et al
as 1:2024cv01066
Plaintiff:
World Association of Icehockey Players Unions North America Division, World Association of Icehockey Players Unions USA Corporation, Tanner Gould and others
Defendant:
National Hockey League, Canadian Hockey League, Western Hockey League and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
Purcell et al v. Continental Aktiengesellschaft et al
as 1:2024cv00938
Plaintiff:
Daniel Purcell, Luke Cuddy and Elizabeth Twitchell
Defendant:
Continental Aktiengesellschaft, Continental Tire The Americas, LLC, Compagnie Generale Des Etablissements and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
D'Onofrio General Contractors Corp. v. Sika AG et al
as 1:2024cv00783
Plaintiff:
D'Onofrio General Contractors Corp.
Defendant:
Sika AG, Sika Corporation, Chryso, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337 Sherman-Clayton Act
Palladino v. JPMorgan Chase & Co.
as 23-1031
Plaintiff / Appellant:
John Palladino, Garib Karapetyan, Steve Palladino and others
Defendant / Appellee:
JPMorgan Chase & Co., JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A., Bank of America Corporation and others
PHHHOTO Inc. v. Meta Platforms, Inc.
as 23-763
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PHHHOTO Inc.
Defendant / Appellee:
Meta Platforms, Inc., FKA Facebook, Inc.
Defendant:
DOES NOs. 1-7
Amicus Curiae:
The Committee to Support The Antitrust Laws, Josh Davis, Christopher R. Leslie and others
Davitashvili v. Grubhub Inc.
as 23-521
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Mariam Davitashvili, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Adam Bensimon, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Mia Sapienza and others
Defendant:
DoorDash Inc.
Defendant / Appellant:
Postmates Inc., Uber Technologies, Inc., in its own right and as parent of wholly owned subsidiary Uber Eats and Grubhub Inc., DBA Seamless
Amicus Curiae:
United States Chamber of Commerce
Davitashvili v. Grubhub Inc.
as 23-522
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Mariam Davitashvili, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Adam Bensimon, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Mia Sapienza and others
Defendant:
DoorDash Inc., Postmates Inc. and Uber Technologies, Inc., in its own right and as parent of wholly owned subsidiary Uber Eats
Defendant / Appellant:
Grubhub Inc., DBA Seamless
Amicus Curiae:
United States Chamber of Commerce
Inform Inc. v. Google LLC et al
as 1:2023cv01530
Plaintiff:
Inform Inc.
Defendant:
Google LLC, Google Inc,, Alphabet Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
