Cases 1 - 5 of 5
In Re Keurig K-Cup Indirect Purchaser Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2014cv04391
Plaintiff:
Shirley Schroeder , Constance Werthe , Patricia J. Nelson and others
Defendant:
Keurig Green Mountain Inc. and Keurig, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
In re: Keurig Green Mountain Single-Serve Coffee Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2014md02542
Plaintiff:
Yelda Mesbah Bartlett, Bay Valley Foods, LLC, Lavinia Simona Biasell and others
Defendant:
Green Mountain Coffee Roasters, Inc., Keurig Green Mountain, Inc., Keurig Green Mountain, Inc., f/k/a Green Mountain Coffee Roasters, Inc., and as successor to Keurig, and others
Interested Party:
JBR, Inc. (d/b/a Rogers Family Company)
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
All Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs
Petitioner:
Sagentia, Inc. and Sagentia, Ltd.
Special Master:
Hon. Barbara S. Jones
Not Classified By Court:
Amazon.Com, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Coalition for a Level Playing v. Autozone, Inc.
as 11-4595
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Coalition for a Level Playing Field, L.L.C., Robert Elgart & Son Inc., Amelia's Automotive Inc. and others
Defendant:
Acdelco, Inc., Honeywell International, Inc., Arvin Industries, Inc. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Autozone, Inc., Autozone Florida, L.P., Adap, Inc. and others
Coalition for a Level Playing v. Autozone, Inc.
as 11-4595
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Coalition for a Level Playing Field, L.L.C., Robert Elgart & Son Inc., Amelia's Automotive Inc. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Autozone, Inc., Autozone Florida, L.P., Adap, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Acdelco, Inc., Honeywell International Inc., Arvin Industries, Inc. and others
Coalition, L.L.C., et al v. Autozone, Inc., et al
as 0:2000cv00953
Plaintiff:
Coalition for a Level Playing Field, L.L.C., Robert Elgart & Son, Inc., Amelia's Automotive, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Autozone, Inc., Wal-Mart Stores, Advance Stores Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
